« Weingarten an "Enemy of Education?" So Says WSJ | Main | NEA Opposes National Standards. Not. »

Linda Darling-Hammond Gets Hero's Welcome


I have a feeling that were Bon Jovi to show up at the Representative Assembly, he would not nearly be granted the rock-star greeting that Stanford professor Linda Darling-Hammond received when she went to collect her "Friend of the NEA" award today.

She said a number of things that the union applauded:

--"Teaching is the greatest profession because everybody who is anybody was taught how to be somebody by a teacher."

--"It’s not the people who are at fault, it’s the system that needs an overhaul. We need federal policies that support educators in doing the challenging work that they have committed to do."

---"We need a new framework for NCLB that understands that we need multiple measures of student learning, full curriculum in science, social studies, the arts, music, and technology, and we need assessments that are performance-based like those in other countries, where teachers are involved in development and scoring and design of assessments that really measure learning."

--"We need a new form of accountability. Tests and punishments will not create accountability."

She talked about the union's commitment to desegregation and civil rights, an interesting counterpoint to the report blasting the unions released today by the Citizens Commission on Civil Rights (see Eduwonk here for more).

"I get upset when I feel teachers are undervalued," she told me after her speech. "I have spent most of my professional life trying to figure out how to build the profession of teaching."

When I queried her on the Obama administration, she said she felt that the administration was committed to reforms done in partnership with teachers, not to them.

"I see their reform agenda as connected with initiatives teacher associations are already engaging," she said. And the NEA, she added, is now thinking about its work in more expansive ways.


I would have liked to hear Darling-Hammonds' take on the situation that Anthony Cody recently blogged about: only one teacher in the room as 60 people hammer out national standards... how can that be?

Excellent point. Possibly we as educators should insist "Nothing about us without us," as do many other groups.

Or, better yet: "Nothing that's bad for children and learning -- with us or without us.

"We need a new framework for NCLB..."
"We need a new form of accountability."

Three cheers! But "needs", without concrete means/methodology for meeting these needs are empty.

Such methodology exists, and when people like Darling-Hammond and Tony Bryk are seeing the "need", perhaps we'll still get educational "change we can believe in"

Coming up, we will get to juxtapose Ms. Darling-Hammond's remarks and those of Sec. Duncan at the AFT's QuEST Conference in DC July 13-15.

Randi Weingarten and Labor Sec. Hilda Solis will also be featured speakers.

Comments are now closed for this post.

Follow This Blog


Most Viewed on Education Week



Recent Comments

  • lauren: cell phones are what kids crave on they need a read more
  • enjoyjd: One of the most frustrating things for me, when my read more
  • marty: I was once a superb teacher. Students loved me, parents read more
  • J. S. Gephardt: I totally agree that teachers should be evaluated on a read more
  • Lisa: Senority... most parents want their children in a seasoned teachers read more