« Weaker Teachers Leave Tough Schools, Analysis Finds | Main | Rhee, Union Agree to Tentative Contract in D.C. »

UPDATED: Colo., La. Politicians Now Pushing Tenure Reform

| No Recommendations

By now, I hope you've read my story wrapping up some of the action in Ohio, Delaware, Florida and Maryland to overhaul the system broadly known as tenure. The actual terms differ from place to place, but winning tenure generally means that teachers are granted due-process protections that require extensive documentation of poor performance before they can be dismissed.

At the end of the story, I noted that it's unclear whether other states will follow their lead. As it turns out, just this week we've seen some additional movement in Colorado and Louisiana.

In Colorado, state Sen. Michael Johnston, a Democrat, plans to introduce a bill that would require teachers to be deemed "effective" in three evaluations before receiving tenure. Growth in student test scores would be a significant part of the system, according to this Denver Post story.

It's hard to know what the chances of this measure passing are, especially since it looks like it will take on other hot-button issues like forced teacher placements. But if it did pass, it would presumably supercede the governor's council—created as part of the state's Race to the Top bid—that is supposed to hash out the Centennial State's strategy for teacher evaluation and promoting teacher effectiveness.

Tenure reform can, arguably, be divided into two specific kinds of fixes. On the one hand is the proposal to raise the bar, as I focused on in my recent story, so that only teachers who are effective clear that bar.

On the other hand are reforms to due process itself, so that it's less time consuming to dismiss chronically ineffective teachers with tenure. That seems to be the focus of the bill supported by Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, a Republican.

I didn't focus on dismissal in my EdWeek story, but several of the states are looking at it. Delaware code allows teachers with tenure to be dismissed if there is a "pattern of ineffectiveness," usually 2-3 years of ineffective ratings on the state evaluation instrument. Johnston's bill, in Colorado, would also contain a similar provision.

Am I missing any other proposals out there? Write in and tell me.

UPDATED: Ed News Colorado has more information on the Johnston bill, including about how it'll mesh with Gov. Bill Ritter's Educator Effectiveness Council.

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.


Most Viewed on Education Week



Recent Comments