« Lawsuit Contests Unions' Agency Fees in California | Main | Licensing-Test Gaps Exist in Every State, Federal Data Show »

Are Teacher Evaluations Public? Assessing the Landscape


In the wake of several states releasing large sets of "value added" data on individual teachers to media outlets in the past few years, I wrote a widely read story for Education Week on whether formal teacher-evaluation records are publicly accessible. We found quite a lot of variation in the scope of states' open-records laws.

A lot has changed since 2012, with at least five states altering their laws since the story ran. So we wanted to give you a sense of where things stand now.

Tennessee, previously a state in which evaluation results were open, passed a bill in 2012 that closes evaluations off from public disclosure.

New York legislators, in June, passed a law narrowing eligibility for accessing these records. The bill specifies that, on request, parents can view the final effectiveness rating for each teacher in the building to which a student is assigned.

Though case law in Massachusetts already tilted in this direction, a law signed last June explicitly puts teacher evaluations under the definition of "personnel information" exempt from disclosure under open-records laws.

Utah passed a bill in March 2012 (just days after our earlier story went to press) strengthening existing prohibitions on the release of personnel evaluations.

UPDATED, May 15, 9:00 a.m.: Thanks to New Jersey officials for reminding us of this change. New Jersey's teacher-evaluation-reform law, passed last August, also requires evaluations to be confidential and not released to the public.

Readers brought to our attention laws under education code, rather than open-records code, in Georgia and Arizona prohibiting the release of evaluations, so we've updated the data for those states, too.
Thumbnail image for v32_31Teacher_Eval_For-Blog.jpg

Keep in mind that some of these states, Utah and New York among them, require the aggregate reporting of scores on district report cards, usually by the percent of teachers in each category.

In the meantime, action in this area of policy continues to bubble. There's debate in Utah over apparently conflicting language in its statutes and a Florida measure seeking to exempt the release of growth-measure data is stuck in a house committee.

As always, let us know if we've missed something.

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.


Most Viewed on Education Week



Recent Comments