States want local unions to sign off on their Race to the Top Plans, but will affiliates agree to do so?


Misinformation about the details of a new contract agreement is causing concern.


Should there be two separate instruments for teacher improvement and accountability, or can the same instrument serve both purposes?


At the Center for American Progress, Raegen T. Miller, a policy expert (and former teachers'-union leader, natch) has an interesting paper up about "value-added" measures of teacher effectiveness. He has two major points: The term value-added itself, which comes from economics, is objectionable to some teachers. It probably needs to be changed reflect that teachers contribute to their practices in ways other than boosting test scores, and that the test scores themselves pick up factors outside of a teacher's control, he writes. He suggests the term "context adjusted achievement test effects" as an alternative. Second, systems that seek to incorporate ...


The Teacher Incentive Fund is poised to receive a large boost under a spending bill that is nearing completion.


Detroit schools' emergency financial manager Robert Bobb and teachers' union leader Keith Johnson have agreed to a tentative contract for the district that contains a lot of New Haven-like reforms. Given that, you'd be forgiven for wondering why the American Federation of Teachers isn't promoting the heck out of it. Well, as this Detroit Free Press story explains, it's not clear whether or not the union membership will actually ratify it. And that comes down to plain ol' bread and butter issues, not the new reform proposals. Given the district's dire financial straights, teachers wouldn't get raises for the next ...


Colleague Anthony Rebora, over at Education Week's Teacher Magazine, is live-blogging the National Staff Development Council's annual conference. He has a really great post up about the definition of professional development in the No Child Left Behind law. Be sure to check it out, because although this may seem wonky, it is probably going to raise its head during the reauthorization process. Lawmakers tried to put a stop to poor quality "one-shot workshops" for teachers almost a decade ago when they wrote the NCLB law. The professional development funded through NCLB's Title I, Title II, and right on down the ...


A few weeks back, I mused whether we'd see more state and local action to review seniority provisions, since it seemed like states were doing a lot on evaluation and pay, but not the related issue of seniority. Somehow I missed the action in Arizona. A state law that recently took effect there prohibits seniority or tenure from being considered when teachers are laid off and also does away with "recall rights." It would also give districts flexibility to select which teachers' salaries to reduce, rather than applying a general salary reduction. It isn't clear from the local news coverage ...


U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan shares his thoughts about federal teacher policy, including a $3 billion federal funding stream for supporting teacher quality, and teacher involvement in the shaping of performance-pay plans.


A Washington superior court judge has backed Chancellor Michelle Rhee in a dispute with the Washington Teachers' Union over layoffs. The union sought a preliminary injunction that would essentially have required Rhee to reinstate teachers who were laid off supposedly due to budget cuts while other legal claims worked their way through the District of Columbia school system. In essence, the union said that Rhee hired hundreds of young teachers over the summer, more than the district could pay for, thus forcing a later need to make cuts. Because of a series of administrative rulings in the late 1990s, layoffs ...


Follow This Blog

Advertisement

Most Viewed on Education Week

Categories

Archives

Recent Comments