Florida's teachers' union will discourage affiliates from signing off on the state's Race to the Top plan.


To follow my previous post on the MOUs that states are beginning to create for their Race to the Top applications, it's quite interesting that some states are giving their teachers' unions seemingly much more leverage over whether or not the district will actually participate. Some states, like Colorado, are using the Education Department's model MOU wholesale. (It is in the appendix of the application). That one makes no reference to collective bargaining at all. Then there's Massachusetts' MOU, which adds this language: "Nothing in this MOU shall be construed to override any rights or duties as provided by collective ...


States want local unions to sign off on their Race to the Top Plans, but will affiliates agree to do so?


Misinformation about the details of a new contract agreement is causing concern.


Should there be two separate instruments for teacher improvement and accountability, or can the same instrument serve both purposes?


At the Center for American Progress, Raegen T. Miller, a policy expert (and former teachers'-union leader, natch) has an interesting paper up about "value-added" measures of teacher effectiveness. He has two major points: The term value-added itself, which comes from economics, is objectionable to some teachers. It probably needs to be changed reflect that teachers contribute to their practices in ways other than boosting test scores, and that the test scores themselves pick up factors outside of a teacher's control, he writes. He suggests the term "context adjusted achievement test effects" as an alternative. Second, systems that seek to incorporate ...


The Teacher Incentive Fund is poised to receive a large boost under a spending bill that is nearing completion.


Detroit schools' emergency financial manager Robert Bobb and teachers' union leader Keith Johnson have agreed to a tentative contract for the district that contains a lot of New Haven-like reforms. Given that, you'd be forgiven for wondering why the American Federation of Teachers isn't promoting the heck out of it. Well, as this Detroit Free Press story explains, it's not clear whether or not the union membership will actually ratify it. And that comes down to plain ol' bread and butter issues, not the new reform proposals. Given the district's dire financial straights, teachers wouldn't get raises for the next ...


Colleague Anthony Rebora, over at Education Week's Teacher Magazine, is live-blogging the National Staff Development Council's annual conference. He has a really great post up about the definition of professional development in the No Child Left Behind law. Be sure to check it out, because although this may seem wonky, it is probably going to raise its head during the reauthorization process. Lawmakers tried to put a stop to poor quality "one-shot workshops" for teachers almost a decade ago when they wrote the NCLB law. The professional development funded through NCLB's Title I, Title II, and right on down the ...


A few weeks back, I mused whether we'd see more state and local action to review seniority provisions, since it seemed like states were doing a lot on evaluation and pay, but not the related issue of seniority. Somehow I missed the action in Arizona. A state law that recently took effect there prohibits seniority or tenure from being considered when teachers are laid off and also does away with "recall rights." It would also give districts flexibility to select which teachers' salaries to reduce, rather than applying a general salary reduction. It isn't clear from the local news coverage ...


Follow This Blog

Advertisement

Most Viewed on Education Week

Categories

Archives

Recent Comments