« Gates Enters The 2008 Campaign | Main | What You Missed From Last Night's Speech »

Dodd Vs. Kennedy: What EdWeek Leaves Out

Lynn Olson's article on the Dodd and Kennedy national standards bill (New Bills Would Prod States to Take National View on Standards) helpfully explains the similarities and differences between the two proposals and tries to tease out their prospects of enactment and background dynamics.

However, the article leaves out two key facts: Kennedy's bill was dropped -- coincidentally or not -- the same afternoon that the Dodd announcement went out, and -- I'll say this as long as I have to -- Eduwonk Andy isn't really the best (most dispassionate or knowledgeable) source to comment on this. Click below to read more.

What outsiders might not understand is that there are two rivalries going on here -- Dodd Vs. Kennedy and Dannenberg Vs. Rotherham -- and both are substantive and institutional.

That's why using Andy as a main source is problematic. National standards are a debate the he hasn't had much at all to do with. From his recent blogging he seems more favorably disposed towards Kennedy's office than Dodd's. The Dodd event didn't include the Ed Sector.

There's also the issue of expertise. The national standards debate predates Andy's arrival on the scene and its consideration lies outside his extremely brief and inconsequential experience in . Better choices? Vic Klatt, Kevin Kosar, Mike Cohen, Danica Petroshius.

PS: Best blogger post title on the topic? It's from Schools Matter: Dodd on Arrival

Disclosure: I spent a lot of my time on the Hill trying to outflank the Kennedy office. I am frequently annoyed by Andy's antics and the media's over-use of him for quotes.

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.


Recent Comments

  • Patrick: A very fitting farewell. So does this mean that David read more




Technorati search

» Blogs that link here