« High-Flying Schools' Scalability | Main | Teachers of Color Badly Needed »

Community College Placement Tests Can Serve Students Well

With community colleges increasingly seen as an educational bargain, it's worthwhile taking a closer look at Accuplacer ("How a Little-Known Standardized Test Harms Community College Students," Washington Monthly, Apr. 17).  This obscure standardized test by the College Board consists of multiple-choice items in math and English that determine if students belong in remedial classes.

The argument against its use is that GPAs are a better indication of readiness.  This view is supported by the National Center for Education Statistics, which found that nearly half of community college students who were strongly prepared wound up in remediation. Funneling so many into remedial classes increased their risk of dropping out since the courses do not count toward graduation.

I have serious doubts about the disproportionate emphasis on any standardized test to determine placement, but I think there's another side of the story that warrants consideration.  Aren't low-scoring students better served by giving them the help they need before they take credit-granting courses?  There's nothing more damaging to the self-confidence of students than placing them in credit-counting courses based on their high school GPAs and then letting them find out they are in over their heads.

Although Accuplacer is hardly perfect, I think it still serves a valuable purpose in community colleges. 

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.


Most Viewed on Education Week



Recent Comments