November 2011 Archives

November 29, 2011

Response: Several Ways Teachers Can Create a Supportive Environment for Each Other

S.H. asked:

Our school culture has a growing sense of [unhealthy] competitiveness. I believe a lot of this stems from the fact that our administration does not recognize (or maybe they do and simply don't voice) teacher expertise using specific, positive praise. We do receive thanks yous - but they tend to be blanket statements and pretty general. (For example, "Thank you Ms. _____ for helping your team out.")

This appears to have led to some teachers to measure themselves against others. Rather than feeling grateful that the students in our school are being taught by many talented teachers, it has become a zero-sum game and fed rivalries and pettiness.

It's sad for me to admit this, but I don't think there's a ton of hope in my administration changing their ways. I guess my question is, how can teachers create a sincere, supportive environment for each other?

I've asked Bill Ferriter and Parry Graham, co-authors of Building a Professional Learning Community at Work: A Guide to the First Year, to provide guest responses to this tricky question, and also include some excellent reader responses later in this post.

I think they offer excellent specific suggestions. The one thought I'd like to contribute is that a challenge to many of us -- whether it is how we operate as teachers with our colleagues or with our students, or if we are administrators or policymakers -- is that it's easy to get caught up in the belief that power (or potential advancement, or success -- whatever you want to call it) is a finite pie -- that if you get some that means I will have less. The reality in the vast majority of instances is that the more I share with you, the bigger the whole pie gets and greater possibilities are created for everyone.

If I share my lesson plan with you, that really means that you might be able to make it better for both of us. If I tell you about the challenges that I faced in the classroom today, instead of making me appear weak, it instead demonstrates that I have the self-confidence to share and hear ideas from others who have probably experienced similar problems (or will in the future).

This perspective of the "pie getting bigger" is a core belief of community organizers (which I was for nineteen years prior to becoming a teacher). The first step towards making this happen in any institution or neighborhood is to build relationships -- an exchange of personal and professional stories -- so that people can learn the hopes, dreams and challenges of each other. The trust that develops during these conversations is the key building block towards countless possibilities...

Response From Bill Ferriter:

Bill Ferriter teaches 6th grade language arts in North Carolina, where he was named a Regional Teacher of the Year for 2005-2006. He is a member of The Teacher Leaders Network.

Another factor that feeds rivalries and pettiness in PLCs is the unhealthy push in many districts and states to use standardized test scores to rate and sort teachers.
Anytime that we try to assign numbers to individual teachers--rather than recognize that improvements in student performance come from collective reflection around practice AND the collective contributions of all of the practitioners that work with a group of children--competition is inevitable.

One way to address this is to establish a team norm that collaborative efforts AREN'T about studying successful people. Instead, they are about studying successful PRACTICES. While that may seem like a subtle bit of semantic gymnastics, it is an essential shift made by every healthy learning team. Conversations focused on the practices--instead of the people--that produce the best results are safer for everyone.

More importantly, they send the message that by working together to enhance and amplify effective instructional practices, a learning team can make tangible improvements in student achievement.

You'll have to be militant about language in order to cement this norm into your collaborative work, though.

Because teachers are (1). surrounded by efforts to tie performance to individuals instead of collaborative groups and (2). used to working in isolation, it is only natural to see competitive teacher-centered language slip into our conversations.

"Wow," we'll say, "Mary is a master! Look at her student's scores on the last assessment."

Instead, we should be saying, "Wow. Mary has discovered a practice that works! Look at her student's scores on the last assessment. How did you teach those skills, Mary?"
When your team stops talking about teachers and starts talking about teaching--or more accurately, student learning--you'll begin to erase the competition and defensiveness that is destroying your collaborative work.

Response From Dr. Parry Graham:

Dr. Parry Graham is the current principal of Luftkin Road Middle School in the Wake County Public School System. He is also an adjunct professor in the education department at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

From what I can tell, there are two levels to this complex question. The first level is, what can an individual teacher do to impact the culture of her individual professional learning team? The second level is, what can teachers do to impact the culture of their schools?

At the team level (or department level or grade level), I think there are a couple steps a teacher can take. First, model what you think is positive behavior: don't gossip about other teachers, keep comments about others positive, praise others when you see something worth praising. Second, bring up your observations in team meetings. Mention your perceptions of negativity during a team meeting, ask if others have similar perceptions, and identify specific behaviors at the team level that can help to build a positive team culture.

At the school level, things get more complicated. First, I am somewhat dubious that a relatively simple behavior on the part of the administrative team--i.e., not recognizing teacher expertise using specific praise--could be the primary factor underlying a competitive culture throughout a school. School cultures are complex creatures that typically result from years of behaviors, actions, attitudes, and beliefs. Yes, administrators have some control over culture, but my guess is that the factors underlying this school's culture go much deeper.

So get involved in the kinds of groups that can influence school culture. If they exist, volunteer to serve on the school's improvement or leadership team, on curriculum committees, or on a hospitality group. If your backyard will handle it, host a schoolwide barbeque to bring teachers together outside of school. Set up a Friday afternoon club that meets after school to decompress over beverages of choice. In short, work to improve the relationships between the adults in the building, one interaction at a time.

Reader Responses

Kristen Hewett:

Building a sense of family and community spirit has been something that my school has struggled with for the past few years. As a mentor to our beginning teachers, one thing that I have started this year has been to ask them to select a staff member who exemplifies a certain trait that they admire and would like to emulate and have them let this teacher know this through a short note or a card. My hope is that this will allow my beginning teachers to make connections with other staff members and that it will help to build morale. My ultimate goal is to take this idea and slowly branch it out into other areas and begin a "pay it forward" type of movement. I know that this is just one small step, but my hope is that our small steps will eventually spark bigger changes.

Tyrion Lannister shares a way not to create a supportive environment:

My old school ordered teachers to collaborate, and then graded our collaboration according to a rubric.

Please feel free to leave a comment sharing your reactions to this question and the ideas shared here.

Thanks to Bill, Parry, Kristen, and Tyrion for sharing their responses!

Consider contributing a question to be answered in a future post. You can send one to me at lferlazzo@epe.org.When you send it in, let me know if I can use your real name if it's selected or if you'd prefer remaining anonymous and have a pseudonym in mind.

Anyone whose question is selected for this weekly column can choose one free book from a selection of twelve published by Eye On Education.

I'll be posting the next "question of the week" on Friday.

November 17, 2011

How Can Teachers Create A Supportive Environment For Each Other?

S.H. asks:

Our school culture has a growing sense of [unhealthy] competitiveness. I believe a lot of this stems from the fact that our administration does not recognize (or maybe they do and simply don't voice) teacher expertise using specific, positive praise. We do receive thanks yous - but they tend to be blanket statements and pretty general. (For example, "Thank you Ms. _____ for helping your team out.")

This appears to have led to some teachers to measure themselves against others. Rather than feeling grateful that the students in our school are being taught by many talented teachers, it has become a zero-sum game and fed rivalries and pettiness.

It's sad for me to admit this, but I don't think there's a ton of hope in my administration changing their ways. I guess my question is, how can teachers create a sincere, supportive environment for each other?

I suspect S.H. is not the only educator out there facing this kind of challenge.

Please share your responses in the comments, or, if you prefer, feel free to email them to me.

Anyone whose question is selected for this weekly column can choose one free book from a selection of twelve (including my own) published by Eye On Education.

You can send questions to me at lferlazzo@epe.org.When you send in your question, let me know if I can use your real name if it's selected or if you'd prefer remaining anonymous and have a pseudonym in mind.

And just a reminder -- you can subscribe to this blog for free via RSS Reader or email....

I'll be taking a Thanksgiving break, so the response to this question won't appear until November 30th.

November 15, 2011

Several Ways To Tell The Difference Between Good & Bad Education Research

Last week, I asked a question that had been on my mind:

How can you tell the difference between good and bad education research?

Colleagues in the Teacher Leaders Network and I have previously written about the importance of having a certain amount of healthy skepticism about research in the field, and I've written about the importance of being data-informed instead of being data-driven.

Even then, though, we need to be careful about which data is informing us, and how it is being interpreted.

In addition, I've compiled additional resources at The Best Resources For Understanding How To Interpret Education Research.

Today, two experienced education researchers have provided guest responses -- Matthew Di Carlo. from the Albert Shanker Institute and P. L. Thomas from Furman University. I'm also publishing comments from two readers.

Response From Matthew Di Carlo:

Matthew Di Carlo is a Senior fellow at the Albert Shanker Institute, and often writes for the Institute's highly-regarded blog.

I would encourage people not to think of research as "good" or "bad." The better question, especially in policy research, is: Do the data and methods used to analyze them support the conclusions? Even the simplest analyses can be useful if interpreted properly. Conversely, the most sophisticated studies can be counterproductive if they're used to draw inappropriate conclusions.

So, though far from an exhaustive list, here are a few questions to ask yourself when reading research papers and reports.

Is there a causal argument being made? You've probably heard the phrase "correlation is not causation," and it's probably the most important thing to keep in mind when interpreting policy research. For instance, schools that spend more might have higher test scores, but that doesn't mean the spending is directly responsible for the higher scores. You can be most confident that effects are causal when researchers use experimental methods, including random assignment (like you'd do if you were testing a drug). Statistical techniques, such as models that attempt to "control for" the influence of other measurable factors, can provide tentative evidence of causality. Be wary of any analysis that claims, or even implies, that X causes Y, when that assertion is not directly tested. It's often little more than speculation.

Is the size of the "effect" meaningful? A "statistically significant effect" only means that the association is unlikely to be zero (and it's not necessarily causal, either). These "effects" are often so small as to be educationally meaningless, or at least not large enough to carry policy implications. Read the part of papers that discusses the size of the effect, which many authors "translate" into more accessible terms. And never rely solely on summaries or abstracts.

Do the findings and conclusions square with prior research? No one study can confirm or deny anything. In addition, policies that work in one context do not necessarily work in others. There is almost always relevant prior evidence. If it conflicts with a paper's findings, or if results seem to vary by context or location, those are warning signs that any conclusions are, at most, tentative. Most papers have a literature review, which is a useful starting point.

Has the research undergone a professional peer review process? Papers and reports reviewed and approved by experts in the field have undergone a "quality control" process, and you can have more confidence in their methods and conclusions. Most commonly, this includes papers published in peer-reviewed academic journals. Good research organizations, such as Mathematica and RAND, have internal review processes.

My final and perhaps most important recommendation is to keep at it, and muddle through, even if you think it's "over your head." Don't be frustrated. The more papers and reports you read in a given area, the better-equipped you'll be to interpret them properly. Consuming research, just like research itself, is a difficult, cumulative process. Progress can be slow, but there is no chance of failure if you persist.

Response From P.L. Thomas:

P. L. Thomas is an Associate Professor at Furman University and taught high school English for 18 years before moving to higher education. His Ignoring Poverty in the U.S.: The Corporate Takeover of Public Education will be published this fall by Information Age Publishing.

His response is a summary he wrote of a longer piece titled A Primer On Navigating Education Claims.

For all stakeholders in U.S. public education, debates about education and education reform can be taxing, confusing, and ultimately circular, resulting in little that we call productive.

Here, then, I want to offer some guiding questions for navigating the education debate based on my own experience as an educator for nearly three decades (almost two decades as a high school teacher and another decade in higher education/teacher education) and my extensive work as a commentator in print and on-line publications.

When you confront claims about education, and the inevitable counter-claims, what should you be looking for?:

• Are the claims and counter-claims framed within the perspective of the person making them?

• Are educational claims framed as "miracles"?

• Are the claims of educational quality expressed in terms of correlation or causation?

• Do the claims address student populations being addressed?

• Do claims of education success by non-public schools address issues of scalability, selection, attrition, stratification/re-segregation of students, and out-of-school factors?

• Do counter-claims made about education commentaries start with fair and accurate characterizations of the positions being debated?

• What are the experiences and credentials of the person making the claim?

• Are claims supported with evidence -- citations, hyperlinks, or both?

Just as our public schools appear to be mired in conditions that never change, our public debates about education and education reform suffer from insular and unproductive cycles of monologues.

Our public schools need and our children deserve genuine school reform -- reform that is nuanced and complex -- and without the same nuance and complexity in an authentic dialogue about education and education reform, we are unlikely to reach the school reform we need.

Responses From Readers:

Paul Bruno:

One thing I'd say to look out for: poorly-defined or poorly-selected comparison or control groups. A lot of educational interventions look impressive until you realize that in terms of comparative effectiveness they actually do quite poorly.

I'm guessing it's a widespread problem, but I see this with a lot of research on "metacognitive strategy" and "discovery learning" interventions, both of which look good compared to nothing but fare poorly against, e.g., vocabulary/content instruction and direct instruction, respectively.

One of my most vivid memories of grad school in education was one of the most esteemed faculty members in the department disparaging controlled experiments because, basically, they're hard to do in educational contexts. And it's true, they're hard to do! But research that doesn't bother even trying should set off our alarm bells.

ssilvius:

Good research is extremely careful about definitions. It does not attempt to appear value-neutral, but rather makes its values explicit and apparent.

When qualitative, it lays out a careful narrative, highlighting exceptions and subtleties, analyzing linguistic and observational information in detail.

When quantitative, it makes the structure of the study EXTREMELY transparent. It provides rationales for choices of categories, descriptors, survey questions, test hypotheses, and all the places that values can sneak into data without being noticed. It does not simply mine the data and then confirm itself, but uses separate data or observation to develop hypotheses and then runs tests to support or reject them. It reports effect sizes, gives access to sources and raw data, and includes enough detail to be replicable. It is given a thumbs up by Shanker Blog.

Good research is typically not funded by think tanks or foundations but is peer reviewed (though this is hardly a guarantee of quality) . It does not generalize its findings except when suggesting further work to do. It recognizes the inherent complexity of social research particularly in a field like education and does not attempt to reduce human beings and their social systems to easily manipulated bytes--sound or data.

Most of all, good education research does not attempt to provide absolute answers, but rather attempts to be interesting and relevant to people who do education. The best research is often small in scope, big in ideas. It starts or continues a discussion and challenges/advances the way we think about our praxis.

Please feel free to leave a comment sharing your reactions to this question and the ideas shared here.

Thanks to Matthew, P.L. Thomas, Paul, and ssilvius for sharing their responses!

Consider contributing a question to be answered in a future post. You can send one to me at lferlazzo@epe.org.When you send it in, let me know if I can use your real name if it's selected or if you'd prefer remaining anonymous and have a pseudonym in mind.

Anyone whose question is selected for this weekly column can choose one free book from a selection of twelve published by Eye On Education.

I'll be posting the next "question of the week" on Friday.

November 10, 2011

How Can You Tell The Difference Between Good And Bad Education Research?

In addition to responding the questions submitted by readers, now and then I pose a question that's been on my mind and that I believe others might find interesting. This is a week for one of those questions, and it's:

How can you tell the difference between good and bad education research?

Colleagues in the Teacher Leaders Network and I have previously written about the importance of having a certain amount of healthy skepticism about research in the field, and I've written about the importance of being data-informed instead of being data-driven.

Even then, though, we need to be careful about which data is informing us, and how it is being interpreted.

Please share your responses in the comments, or, if you prefer, feel free to email them to me.

Anyone whose question is selected for this weekly column can choose one free book from a selection of twelve published by Eye On Education.

You can send questions to me at lferlazzo@epe.org.When you send in your question, let me know if I can use your real name if it's selected or if you'd prefer remaining anonymous and have a pseudonym in mind.

And just a reminder -- you can subscribe to this blog for free via RSS Reader or email....

November 08, 2011

Response: Several Ways To Teach Critical Thinking Skills

An educator who prefers to remain anonymous asked:

How do you go about teaching critical thinking skills?

I try to infuse critical thinking during much of my teaching, and have particularly found the "thinking routines" developed by Project Zero in Harvard useful. I describe in my latest book how I use two of their recommended questions: "What's going on here?" and "What do you see that makes you say so?"

One other strategy I use is helping students understand the difference between opinion and judgment. It's a perspective shared by many community organizers (I was one for nineteen years prior to becoming a high school teacher). An opinion is something you decide on your own, while judgment is a belief you develop after you share your opinion with others and hear theirs, too. It's not always a good idea to change what you think, but all too often in our world people are unwilling to be open to listening and to change. In addition to explicitly teaching this critical thinking strategy, I regularly have students share their responses to provocative questions with each other and reflect on if they then want to change them. Invariably, there are at least a few who do....

I feel lucky today because three veteran educators have agreed to share their responses to this week's question. Because of that great abundance, I'll keep my comments short and, instead, encourage readers to explore further resources at The Best Resources On Teaching & Learning Critical Thinking In The Classroom.

Ron Ritchhart from Project Zero; teacher and author Todd Stanley; and Robert Swartz from The National Center for Teaching Thinking have all contributed guest responses today. In addition, there is an insightful comment from a reader.

Response from Ron Ritchhart

Ron Ritchhart is a well-known author and researcher for Harvard's Project Zero. He is the Director of the Cultures of Thinking project at the Project.

Critical thinking has been floating around the world of education for years. However, it has often been treated as an add-on to the curriculum rather a core aspect of learning. In the past ten to fifteen years this has begun to change as schools attend more and more to developing students' habits of mind, thinking disposition, and 21st century skills.

If we take seriously the notion that learning is a consequence of thinking, then thinking--in all its forms: critical, creative, and reflective--needs to be a part of every lesson we teach.

To make thinking more central in one's teaching, begin by identifying the types of thinking one wants to promote. In the Cultures of Thinking project, we begin by focusing on the kinds of thinking needed to build understanding: making connections, looking at things from different perspectives, constructing explanations and interpretations, reasoning with evidence, wondering and asking questions, describing the parts and features of a thing, and forming conclusions. This isn't an exhaustive list, but it captures several high-leverage "thinking moves" around which teachers can build lessons, assignments, and questions. Many teachers like to post these moves in the classroom as a "map of understanding" that they and their students can refer to throughout the learning process.

It's important to make the thinking you are after explicit in your teaching rather than expecting students to automatically think on their own. One way to do this is to use "thinking routines" to help structure and scaffold students' thinking. For example, after watching a video or reading a text, ask students how the information connects to what the class has already studied about the topic, how does this new information extend their knowledge, and what challenges or questions emerge about the topic as a result. This routine, Connect-Extend-Challenge, scaffolds the active processing of new information by making the thinking involved visible and explicit to all. Other such routines can be found in the book, Making Thinking Visible, or on the website.

Response From Todd Stanley

Todd Stanley is a National Board Certified Teacher and has been a classroom teacher for the past 13 years. He is the co-author of Critical Thinking and Formative Assessments: Increasing the Rigor in Your Classroom.

Many times teaching critical thinking in the classroom comes in the form of the questions the teacher asks. If a teacher asks lower level questions, that is what he will receive. But if he asks questions that require more deeper thinking at the level of analysis, synthesis, or evaluation, then he will get answers that use critical thinking.

For example, when I am teaching history to students, I tell them we will not be spending most of our time looking at the what, where, when, and who. Those facts might be important but they are only the basic building blocks used to reach critical thinking. Instead I focus on questions that look at the why and how.

I remember one time I was writing an assessment with a very traditional Social Studies teacher and I suggested the question, "How would the United States be different had the British won the American Revolution?" He was flabbergasted by this and responded, "But I can't prove or disprove their answer." My response to him was, "That's the point." If students can back up their answer using the who, what, when, or where, then they have taken that learning to a higher level.

Critical thinking needs to become part of the classroom culture where students are seeing it in everything they do. This can come in the form of a daily question written on the board students write about, the questions you ask in a class discussion, or the questions you write on your assessments.

Response From Robert Swartz

Robert Swartz is the Director of The National Center for Teaching Thinking.

Let's look at a lesson that is designed to infuse instruction in critical thinking into standard content instruction ....

In this case 9th grade students are studying the Revolutionary War and its origins. As they read their textbook they find a passage that describes the first "hot" fighting of this war: it says that British soldiers, on their way to Concord, Massachusetts to seize a store of arms that the colonists had accumulated, encountered a group of colonists on the village green in Lexington, Massachusetts, part of the way to Concord. They ordered them to disperse. But when they didn't, it says, the British opened fire and killed some colonists (called "patriots" in the text and later "Minute Men"). The rest did, then, disperse.

This is the standard account found in many US textbooks.

The teacher, however, says to the students that last night he found another book that says just the opposite. He reads a passage to them that suggests that the colonists opened fire on the British, who then returned the fire to protect themselves. How can one find out which of these we should believe? He suggests that one way to do this is to ask which is a more reliable source?

He guides the students explicitly to figure out what they would want to find out about a source of information to judge it to be reliable, and then he guides them to develop two organized checklists of questions that they can use, one for secondary sources, and the other for primary sources (in this case eyewitnesses). These involve questions like "What is the background and credentials of the author?", "What is the reputation of the publication (if published)?", "How was the information obtained?", and "Has anyone else corroborated what the author says?". They agree that no one of these is definitive, but that a pattern in the evidence might show the likelihood that a source of information was reliable.

What do the students find when they do this? When they investigate they discover, in fact, that they can answer some of their questions, but that the evidence available is itself seriously conflicting. Their conclusion is that, based on this evidence, we can't tell who fired the first shot, and they suggest that it would be better for these authors to say "To this day no one knows who fired that first shot" rather than to embellish their accounts, as they seem to do, with unsupported claims. These students are suggesting that after critical investigation the best answer is "We don't know!" How many teachers would honor "I don't know" as a right answer?

When the students reach their conclusions the teacher then finishes the lesson by asking them to reflect back on the strategy they used to make this judgment to see if they think it worked: Did they leave something important out, do they want to revise it in some way, or is it ok as it stands? In effect, they are guided to reflect critically on the standards they used to make their judgment about which source is the reliable one.

This is a rich lesson that not only leads to a deeper understanding of the content these students are learning, but arms these students with an explicit strategy for making similar critical-thinking-based judgments about the reliability of sources of information in their lives outside school.

Response From A Reader

JEB:

1. Critical thinking looks different in different disciplines. Just think of the adults you know who clearly think critically about their main fields of interests or the work they do, but are completely at sea thinking critically about areas that they lack knowledge in, or are uninterested in.

2. Much of what it takes to develop critical thinking skills comes from being led by a skilled teacher through some of the processes involved.

3. The processes are both procedural and content-based. There is no such thing as thinking critically about an issue where you have no knowledge base. That knowledge base might be something that students bring with them to the classroom, having learned it earlier in their schooling or at home or out in the world. Or it might be a knowledge base tha has to be mastered in the present, at the same time as the procedureal skills are being learned.

Please feel free to leave a comment sharing your reactions to this question and the ideas shared here.

Thanks again to "Anonymous" for posing this week's question and to Ron, Todd, Robert, and JEB for sharing their responses!

Consider contributing a question to be answered in a future post. You can send one to me at lferlazzo@epe.org.When you send it in, let me know if I can use your real name if it's selected or if you'd prefer remaining anonymous and have a pseudonym in mind.

Anyone whose question is selected for this weekly column can choose one free book from a selection of twelve published by Eye On Education.

I'll be posting the next "question of the week" on Friday.

November 03, 2011

How Can We Teach Critical Thinking Skills?

This week's question comes from an educator who prefers to remain anonymous:

How do you go about teaching critical thinking skills?

Boy, this is sure an important issue! And one where we often need to remember William Butler Yeats' often quoted comment: "Education is not filling a bucket, but lighting a fire."

Please share your responses in the comments, or, if you prefer, feel free to email them to me.

Anyone whose question is selected for this weekly column can choose one free book from a selection of twelve published by Eye On Education.

You can send questions to me at lferlazzo@epe.org.When you send in your question, let me know if I can use your real name if it's selected or if you'd prefer remaining anonymous and have a pseudonym in mind.

And just a reminder -- you can subscribe to this blog for free via RSS Reader or email....

November 01, 2011

Response: Can Teachers Be Friends With Students Using Social Media?

(NOTE: This is the concluding post in a three-part series)

Brad Patterson asked:

Can we be friends with our students? Where do we create barriers? How about social-media wise? I'm interested to hear about your experience, lessons learned, regrets, what you would offer as advice for new teachers.

Rick Wormeli provided his response in the first post of this three-part series. In Part Two, I shared how this issue relates to the differences between a "public" and a "private" relationship and Jose Vilson's response to Brad's question.

Today, I'll conclude this series with two guest responses -- from Bud Hunt and Ernie Rambo -- primarily answering the question through the lens of social media.

Though the term social media also includes tools like public blogs (which many educators, including me, use in our classes), this post is primarily looking at tools like Facebook and the more recent Google Plus. These also allow private communication, and Missouri unsuccessfully attempted to prohibit teachers from using them with their students. The school district in Dayton, Ohio recently announced similar restrictions.

I generally accept "friend" requests from students after they have graduated, though sometimes also say yes if they are seniors still attending our school but not in any of my classes. Others, including today's guest writers, have devoted far more thought than I have to the issue, and you can read further reflections at A Beginning List Of The Best Resources For Learning About Facebook.

Response From Ernie Rambo

Susan "Ernie" Rambo is a 23-year classroom veteran who currently teaches in the Clark County School District of Las Vegas, NV. She is a member of the Teacher Leaders Network.

I'd rather be friendly with my students than friends with my students. In social networking, this question takes on additional meaning. Can we be friends with students on Facebook or other social networks? Several of my colleagues refuse all friend requests from students, usually because they prefer their private lives to remain separate from their professional lives. Other teachers enjoy getting to know more about their students - and find that using social networks is an effective way to communicate with students about upcoming assignments and motivating them to complete their work. I sided with the latter example for a few months, but then "unfriended" my students when my school district "strongly recommended" that we not associate with any students on social networks. It seemed as if the school district was protecting itself with that recommendation, but they gave us several examples of how students had taken well-meaning posts out of context and used them to discredit teachers.

Technology specialist Patrick Ledesma makes a strong point in an article about social networking with students. Patrick mentions that while educators will see social networking as an effective way to "enhance instruction and communication," students see social networks differently: as a place for social interaction and not much more.

There are other ways to communicate with students in a friendly way. Instead of friending students on Facebook, I encourage students to post their assignments on Collaborize Classroom and Edmodo. I remind them that these are academic networks, not social networks and that they need to remember to post accordingly, providing a few silly examples for them and they get the point. I enjoy getting to know my students through their academic posts, without the potential for misunderstandings that might occur in social networking. And after the students have completed their assignments, they can tell their friends all about it on Facebook.

Response From Bud Hunt

Bud Hunt is an instructional technologist for the St. Vrain Valley School District in northern Colorado. This is an excerpt from a longer post at the Powerful Learning Practice blog.

One of my favorite teachers told me once that he dressed the way that he did -- jackets, ties, and other business attire -- because he wanted us to know that, while he was our teacher, he was not our friend.

And I thought that made sense. It was his job to advocate for us. To challenge us. To help us be the best we could be. And so he wasn't our friend. He was our teacher. To keep those ideas separate, he used his dress. I think that's worth remembering as we move more and more of our work as teachers into online spaces.

One of our many jobs as teachers is to keep a professional separation between who we are and what we do. When we are doing our best, we are presenting ourselves in ways that help to manage that professional distance in thoughtful and productive ways.
In social networks, this looks like being present, being thoughtful, and being intentional in the ways that we use those spaces to promote what we think is essential -- ways that do not confuse our teacherness and our friendness and help our students understand the difference between the two.

I made a choice as I moved forward in working with and building online spaces for teaching and learning that I wouldn't friend current students on Facebook. My wife, a high school language arts teacher, has adopted a rule that I think is a fine standard. She does not friend students until they graduate from high school.

Facebook is not her primary online space for interacting with students. She has created course spaces where students and she engage in course-related conversation and content. And she maintains a professional presence in her personal Facebook account. That's a good thing. Graduates who choose to continue the relationship past their time in high school find much the same person that they found in the classroom. And those students talk with her, mostly, about the same things that they would have in their school spaces.

She is never not a teacher, though.

I'd encourage you to do the same. Wherever you are as a person and as a professional, you are still a teacher. It's a high calling that we've gone after. Whenever and wherever you are, seek to model the best of your professional and personal self. Keep a sense of professional distance.

A professional persona

Professional distance doesn't mean be a heartless, soulless automaton. Certainly, care and love and concern for the young people in our work is paramount. But it does mean be intentional and purposeful about the ways that you present yourself, wherever you may happen to be.

Please feel free to leave a comment sharing your reactions to this question and the ideas shared here.

Thanks again to Brad for posing this week's question and to Bud and Ernie for sharing their responses!

Consider contributing a question to be answered in a future post. You can send one to me at lferlazzo@epe.org.When you send it in, let me know if I can use your real name if it's selected or if you'd prefer remaining anonymous and have a pseudonym in mind.

Anyone whose question is selected for this weekly column can choose one free book from a selection of twelve published by Eye On Education.

I'll be posting the next "question of the week" on Friday.

Follow This Blog

Advertisement

Most Viewed On Teacher

Recent Comments

Archives