New Terrain

Jessica Shyu, who taught special education for two years at an American Indian reservation school in New Mexico, is a program director for Teach For America in Washington, D.C., where she supports and trains TFA teachers. In this blog, Jessica will write about the lives of new teachers in today's schools, exploring their practice, experiences, and career challenges and opportunities. Opinions expressed in the blog are Jessica's own and do not represent the views of Teach for America or teachermagazine.org.

« February 2009 | Main | April 2009 »

March 26, 2009

The gap within the gap

My younger brother never visited me in New Mexico, but he had a loyal following of middle school boys on the Navajo Nation. I may have been the one crafting creative lesson plans and cutting out manipulatives late into the night, and I may have been the one who helped them grow by two reading levels, but "Daniel" was the one who they looked up to.

Den_is_so_cute
Daniel just so happens to be a martial arts superstar, but that was only part of the reason why my boys asked me each week about my then-20-year-old brother. He was who they could relate to. In a teacher's desperate attempt to gain control when working with one of my most challenging students in second-year of teaching, I shared my brother's story. Daniel was never a fan of school and struggled miserably at it for most/all of his life. He failed/nearly failed a few (a lot) of classes in middle school. He didn't have a lot of friends and always got in trouble at home. And he was always compared to his goody-two-shoes big sister. Always.

But in 10th grade, as he was failing class after class, Daniel discovered an interest in martial arts and pursued it. He realized that when he worked hard at something, he did well. He earned praise. He worked harder. And over a few months, he started transferring that mindset over to his school work. By the end of the year, he had worked so hard and took advantage of all the interventions offered to him by the school, he dramatically raised his grades. He graduated high school (it was still a rocky road) and went on to a community college. Then he transferred to a four-year university.

As my student, "Corey" listened, he grew more interested in my brother and peppered me with questions about what Daniel went through. At the end, Corey felt better and got back to work.

I, however, wasn't feeling much better. It hit me in the gut, as it has so many times throughout my work in education, that Daniel's story is what often happens to those of privilege and those with resources. Corey's story does not start with privilege and resource.

There were intervention programs at school, teachers who taught well, and counselors with small-enough caseloads to create homework lunches. My parents took time from work to volunteer at school, read with him every night, paid thousands of dollars for academic enrichment programs, and dragged him through homework night after night.

Corey had a family who loved him, but who wasn't always there, and he had whatever was offered at school, which oftentimes was not much. Pair that with a disability, and you have a 6th grader reading at the 2nd grade level and doing math at the kindergarten level. Daniel may have struggled to read, but it was never a question whether he'd pass the 5th grade text.

Whenever I explain what we do as special educators in Teach For America, I explain that we are working to close the gap within the achievement gap. It is sobering to know that if my brother attended my school in New Mexico, he would have been in special education by the time he got to my 6th grade class and would probably not be where he is right now-- studying for an upcoming accounting exam, hanging out with friends at the university and planning to teach English this summer in Taiwan.

Similarly sobering is knowing deep down that if the 40-some students I taught over two years-- the same kids who learned so ridiculously much in our short time together-- had attended the same high-performing public schools Daniel and I went to, the vast majority of them would not require special education services. Virtually no one would be labeled SPED for life. No one would have to discretely duck into resource classrooms. They would all be reading near grade level.

The good news in all this? We can fix schools. And by fixing schools, we can give Corey pretty much the same opportunities Daniel had.

March 17, 2009

DC Chancellor gives self failing grade

DC Chancellor Michelle Rhee graded herself an "F" when asked by The Washington Times how she would rate her first 20 months in office.

Political gimmick? Blog-worthy sound bite? A self-deprecating way to curry favor? Or just the cruel reality of what it means to not improve faster, better and at a rate of 100 percent in the world of education?

"If my goal is to provide every child that's in my care an excellent education, we're an F on that," she said. "I want to be evaluated on the quality of education that I'm providing to kids," Rhee said in the Times interview. Despite the numerical benchmarks we've hit over the past two years, we're still a long ways away. "The reality is that we have a 70 percent achievement gap between our white kids and our black kids, Ms. Rhee said."

I believe her when she says that DC will one day be the nation's top-performing urban district. I also want to believe that her "F" is more than just a sound bite-- that it's also a sign that our district's leader will hold herself honestly and publicly accountable for doing what's best for kids.

March 5, 2009

Freedom to Debate: Is NCLB Working?

Is NCLB working?

I'm a supporter of No Child Left Behind, not because it doesn't need a ton of fixing, but because I believe it's driving us in the right direction and holding us all accountable to children learning.

So when I heard high school students on National Public Radio tear NCLB apart at the seams and debate why it isn't working, I cried. Not because I disagreed (there are indeed many reasons why it isn't working), but because almost every student at the high school debate competition profiled on NPR attend schools where my first- and second-year teachers teach at. Those young adults go to some of the most under-resourced, under-staffed and under-rigorous schools in the lowest income communities of Washington, DC. And here they were, grappling with whether NCLB has worked.

I went on npr.org to see if anyone had left comments about how great it was that high schoolers were debating some of the most challenging questions we're facing this generation. And to my surprise, no one had said anything about how great it was to hear this positive coverage of DC public high schools for once. Rather, it was a debate on-- you guessed it-- whether NCLB has worked. It was a lively debate from all sorts of directions, some I agreed with (that education needn't be a scarce commodity) and others that I didn't (that too much of our tax dollars are going toward our lowest performing students).

And then the obvious dawned on me. How different would this online discussion look if my own kids from the Navajo Nation could talk about how it wasn't just fancy resources, but objective-driven teachers who got them to grow by 2 grade levels in one year? What would it be like if kids from the border towns of Texas could argue back that NCLB actually deprived them of a more holistic education? How would it sound if one of the DC student debaters could chime in about how accountability actually held his teachers to rigorous standards for once? (A student actually did defend NCLB for that reason in the news piece).

We all have our own opinions about NCLB and one day, my kids will to be able to analyze and rip your ideas apart, or defend them with their own insights. That is what closing the achievement gap will look like.

Jessica Shyu

Jessica Shyu.

Advertisement

April 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30    

Categories

Powered by
Movable Type 3.34

TM Archive