« On Making the Earth Stand Still | Main | Knee Deep in Guilt »

On Serving Two Masters

| 8 Comments

I’m thinking about getting out of the classroom. There is a job that sounds really interesting. According to USAJOBS

The U.S. Department of Education (ED) is looking for the best and brightest to ensure equal access to education and to promote educational excellence throughout the nation. If you are a highly motivated, creative individual who would like to work for an agency that establishes policies on federal financial aid for education; distributes as well as monitors those funds; collects data on America’s schools and disseminates research; focuses national attention on key educational issues; and prohibits discrimination and ensures equal access to education; ED is the place for you! The U.S. Department of Education is recruiting to fill up to 5 temporary (not-to-exceed one year) positions under the Intergovernmental Personnel Act (IPA). The positions are located in Washington, DC. We anticipate that the positions will be filled in June/July 2008 and that the work will extend through July 2009.

It seems that, with less than a year to go, Secretary Spellings has decided to bring some teachers on board as Teacher Ambassadors. There will be twenty Ambassador Fellows and five resident Washington Ambassadors.

Teachers with successful strategies for increasing student achievement are encouraged to obtain principal support to apply for Teaching Ambassador Fellowship positions with the U.S. Department of Education through the Intergovernmental Personnel Act (IPA) for the 2008-2009 school year. Teachers will be chosen based upon their record of leadership, impact on student achievement, and potential for contribution to the field. All Fellows will complete a collaborative project to contribute to the field of education at the national level, and will be encouraged to work with their principals and with government liaisons throughout the year. The program offers two tracks: Classroom and Washington Fellows.

Bess Keller and David Hoff of Education Week wrote that Secretary Spellings offered this rationale of the program.

“It’ll be very useful in both directions for teachers to understand what the issues are at the macro level,” she said in a recent interview. “But it’s also hugely beneficial for us to make sure we know: Is this policy implementable, doable, realistic, and righteous by the classroom teacher?”

I spoke with Bess on the phone, and she asked me what was driving me to consider the job and what might make me hesitate. Why is easy. I’m within commuting distance and in a place in my life where I could do this. I named this blog “A Place at the Table” and I’ve been advocating for teacher perspective in education policy. Part of me argues that not applying is sort of the same as not voting—I lose the right to complain about who is appointed and what they say and do.

So why am I hesitating? I have some unresolved concerns:

Why did it take the current administration seven years to decide that teachers should be part of the process?

There are over 2 million teachers in America. Are 5 full timers and 20 part timers really adequate sample of teacher voice?

Which teachers are going to be able to apply?

What is the criteria for choosing these teachers?

What are the job expectations?

Here are the criteria and the job expectations the application overview offers:

Teachers with successful strategies for increasing student achievement are encouraged to obtain principal support to apply for Teaching Ambassador Fellowship positions with the U.S. Department of Education through the Intergovernmental Personnel Act (IPA) for the 2008-2009 school year. Teachers will be chosen based upon their record of leadership, impact on student achievement, and potential for contribution to the field. All Fellows will complete a collaborative project to contribute to the field of education at the national level, and will be encouraged to work with their principals and with government liaisons throughout the year. The program offers two tracks: Classroom and Washington Fellows.

But there will be a new administration in January and regardless of who wins, there is likely to be a new Secretary of Education and some major adjustments in the DOE. Realistically, how much real impact will these Ambassadors have with their time on the job split right down the middle of two administrations? Will this matter more than time spent with students? And finally, if this is about teacher leadership, doesn’t it seem a little paternalistic to require that I get my principal’s permission to apply?

I was in a movie theater watching Elizabeth: The Golden Age when I finally figured out what was gnawing on me from the beginning about this job prospect. Up on the big screen, I was witnessing betrayal, intrigue, and dead bodies at every turn. And right smack in the center of this political chicanery was... the Spanish ambassador. That was it! The job title!

Ambassador: a diplomatic agent of the highest rank accredited to a foreign government or sovereign as the resident representative of his or her own government or sovereign or appointed for a special and often temporary diplomatic assignment.

An ambassador is a liaison of sorts, but he is not a disinterested one. Who does a Teacher Ambassador represent? Teachers -- or the Department of Education? If teachers, then it would be teachers doing the choosing. But USDOE is doing the picking, and it's logical (and not unfair) to assume that the ambassador will represent the interests of DOE. Does DOE want to know what teachers really think or do they want teachers to validate and promote DOE’s positions?

I have 20 days to left to apply. Is this the opportunity for which I've been waiting? Or a sell out? Or something in between? What do you think?

8 Comments

At the risk of floating a conspiracy theory, why WOULD this program be getting cranked up at the very tail end of the Bush administration? One possible scenario: USDOE wants to reward a group of teachers who have been loyal and in doing so, supply a top-of-the-list item for their 2008-09 resumes. If that's the case, we can guess that they know who they are. Others "need not apply"? It will be interesting to see who gets picked.

I'm applying for this gig, Susan----but primarily because I want to be sure that teachers with policy experience are among the applicant pool. In my experience, there aren't many of us who have had the opportunity to be involved in ed policy at the macro level.


If those of us who do have policy experience do end up at the table, teaching and learning will be the better for it because we'll have the chance to serve as a bridge between policy and practice---something that's often missing in educational decisions.

And if all it is is a sham, all I wasted was the time I spent filling out the application----

And the professional shame of having to get my principal to vouch for me! (I would have thought that my resume speaks for itself.)

Bill

I really wanted to apply for this position for many of the same reasons that Bill applied. I have a lot of instructional leadership experience in my building. My leadership has helped raise the test scores of the students in my building(along with a lot of hard working teachers). My principal and I do not always see "eye to eye". My principal will not sign the paper until she knows exactly what project it is that I would be working on within the building. Therefore, even though I am a very well qualified (according the the candidate requirements listed on the website), I cannot apply because my principal will not support me. That doesn't seem fair to me.

I was just in the process of trying to fill out the application once again, so I know exactly how you feel. I am also considering the reasoning behind the positions offered. Mostly, it concerns me that we cannot apply without consent. This seems to demean the positions importance somewhat. I do feel if we don't apply we cannot really complain about the process. One of my reasons for hesitation, includes my location, Texas is a quite a jaunt from Washington. But I truly feel in order for this to work there must be a variety of educators from different locations. As you say, we have a few more days to consider the possibilities.
Good luck to you and all of the teachers considering these positions.
Carolyn Speers
6th Grade Reading/LA
Sherman Int. School
Sherman, TX 75090

So here we go again. News that is old news to some is just now news to others. It is no wonder teachers are always out of the loop. I learn more from blogs than professional journals! I know some highly respected teachers who would fit the position but no time to apply. Another Bush Administration snafu?
Marth Vincent
Region 8
Education service Center
Mt. Pleasant TX.

I am also applying - mostly because I feel like I can't complain if I don't step up to the plate when the opportunity presents itself. Maybe the DOE already knows who will be picked.. maybe it's a dead end... or maybe it will just be a few days of great conversation with 25 teachers from across the country.. or maybe, just maybe, it'll be an opportunity to really make a difference! Being a risk-taker, I just can't pass it up! dayle

Anyone out there who feels somewhat qualified should apply. Even if the job is a dead end or a sham, imagine the connections to be made! We never know when a person we meet will be someone with whom we can make a difference.

Susan-
You should definitely apply. I was hoping to apply because I felt my experience working with the Governor's Start Strong Council gave me an idea of what it would be like to work with policy makers and I enjoyed it. In fact there were times when I was the one in the room able to move us forward because of my "teacher skills" of using a white board and organizing ideas into a web. Alas, I am not eligible because I am a Pre-K teacher. So, do it for me Susan.

Comments are now closed for this post.

Advertisement

Recent Comments

  • J.M. Holland: Susan- You should definitely apply. I was hoping to apply read more
  • Venieta McLeod: Anyone out there who feels somewhat qualified should apply. Even read more
  • dayle timmons: I am also applying - mostly because I feel like read more
  • Marth Vincent: So here we go again. News that is old news read more
  • Carolyn: I was just in the process of trying to fill read more

Archives

Categories

Technorati

Technorati search

» Blogs that link here