A Place at the Table

Teacher Leaders Network Susan Graham has taught family and consumer science (formerly "home ec") for 25 years. She is a National Board-certified teacher, a former regional Virginia teacher of the year, and a Fellow of the Teacher Leaders Network. She invites readers to pull a chair up to her virtual table as she offers her voice-of-experience perspective on teaching today, with a special focus on teacher leadership and continuous professional growth.

« May 2008 | Main | July 2008 »

June 30, 2008

Smells Like School Spirit

School is out, and my students and my colleagues are reveling in summer.

Summer delights the eye with sunlight through the trees, fireworks on the Fourth, sunburned skin and sun-bleached hair. Summer resonates with the sounds of birds singing in the morning, children splashing and laughing in the midday, and fans softly whirring in the evening. Summer air is perfumed with the scents of spicy sweet petunias, fresh cut grass, and roasting meat and veggies on the grill.

Summer has almost, but not quite, begun for me.

I am on an extended contract, working an extra ten days at the beginning and the end of the school year. Our bustling district community of 1,000 adults is reduced to fifteen summer staff--three administrators, three teachers, two secretaries, one counselor, one bookkeeper, and the maintenance crew. But for those of us who work these extra days, the school has its own summer sensual delights.

The long halls of empty lockers open onto indistinguishable classrooms. Last month each room had its own distinctive character. Now they are uniformly neat, tidy, and sterile. The teachers’ desktops are clear of post-it notes, pens and papers. The bulletin boards are stripped, waiting expectantly for fall.

I can work for an hour hearing only the clatter of my keyboard, the ring of a telephone next door, and the occasional quiet slap of a single pair of sandaled feet down the hall. Sounds that would have never survived the cacophony of a school day now echo in empty space.

On summer mornings when I unlock the back door, it’s the smells I notice first. The aromas of pine scented cleaners and floor wax waft through the hallways of my school. I love that smell. It gives me the same good feeling that comes from a freshly cleaned house or a just-washed car. Things feel renewed, under control and ready for what lies ahead. Floor wax and Pine-Sol are reassuring, promising that in September there will be a fresh start in a familiar environment. My school smells like the security of home and the hope of a new beginning.

It occurs me that too many schools don’t offer those images, sounds and smells of anticipation and potential success. The windows are dirty, the walls are dingy, and the bathrooms have corners encrusted with grime. They have developed that moldering funk of damp ceiling tiles and outdated books that have set too long on undusted shelves. These other school buildings project an air of discouragement and hopelessness, like the odor of sour milk seeping from the dumpster at the back door of the empty lunchroom. When disarray and neglect assault the senses, I wonder about their impact on the students and teachers.

The influence of sensory stimuli has been on my mind this week because my TLN colleagues and I have been having an interesting discussion about distraction. It started with a chat about whether music or even background TV enhanced or impaired the concentration of our students or ourselves. There's always been discussion of aural and visual stimulation, but the more I thought about it, the more I wondered about the olfactory stimuli. Smell is the first and most visceral of our senses. Oliver Wendell Holmes said:

Memories, imagination, old sentiments, and associations are more readily reached through the sense of smell than through any other channel.

Pheromones are serious science, and allergic reactions to smells are increasingly a medical issue. While aromatherapy may be dismissed as New Age fluff and candle stores may be fads, smell is big business. We purchase the scent of fresh cotton, kiwi, sea breezes, wild ginger, fresh baked bread and animal musk in air fresheners, laundry detergents, shampoo, dog food, and a thousand other products.

So tonight I’m wondering, in my FACS teacher mode (which can lead me down some strange hallways indeed): Is my response to a freshly cleaned and waxed hall an inherent or learned response?

Were the fragrances in Pine-Sol, Clorox and Future floorwax chosen because research had determined they would generate positive feelings in me and others? Does the smell of food in my FACS classroom support retention and trigger recall?

Will we ever identify all the variables that influence a child’s interaction with school? Does anyone doubt that a fusty-smelling old school impacts student learning? If there are scents associated with failure, can we define the smell of success?

If we ever define the smell of a successful school, how long will it be before someone tries to market it like new-car smell? How long before someone suggests it as a solution-in-a-can, the perfect thing to mask the festering odor of neglect and decay?

I mean, we've already had the solution-in-a-box. The solution-on-a-disk.The solution-in-a-law. Anyone up for a spritz of School-Smell-So-Good?

June 18, 2008

A Broader Bolder Vision (Some Assembly Required)

You can’t pick up a newspaper without reading something about education, and when The Washington Post carried a huge ad for A Broader, Bolder Approach to Education, it got my attention and piqued my curiosity. So I went to the Broader Bolder website to read the entire report.

“Schools can’t do it alone,” said Co-Chair Helen Ladd. “Accountability is a pillar of our education system, but schools need the support of the community – both before children arrive at school and during their school years – for all children to achieve high standards.”

As a teacher, my first thoughts were: “Thank you for acknowledging that! These people get it!” Most of our schools do the best we can with the circumstances and resources we are given. To simply turn to public education and say “Geez, don’t you people care about kids? You really ought be accountable. The welfare of America’s children is your responsibility. Get with it, or we will deal with you harshly” is not only heartless but naive.

These are the core goals of the “Broader, Bolder Approach” --

• Continued school improvement efforts.

• Developmentally appropriate and high-quality early childhood, pre-school and kindergarten care and education.

• Routine pediatric, dental, hearing and vision care for all infants, toddlers and schoolchildren.

• Improving the quality of students’ out-of-school time.

These seem to be pretty logical and not highly controversial goals that were being endorsed by some people whose names I recognized and respected. But when I started digging into the reactions to this manifesto, things got a little more complicated.

Just about everyone in the virtual education world had something to say, either good or bad, about the Broader Bolder Approach. Think tanks and research groups all seem to have a position on this proclamation, and each group seems to be “interpreting” the “real” agenda of the Broader/Bolder coalition, based on how it fits with its own organizational agenda. Sometimes it seems that the education discussion is more about power and competition between adults than it is about looking for ways to cooperate for the benefit children.

I'm a policy amateur, my knowledge of education politics is shallow, and I don’t pretend to be smart enough to thoroughly deconstruct stakeholders' agendas and motives. I know some of the endorsers by their, in my book, good reputation. I don't really have time or energy to figure out all the backroom alliances or scores that are in the process of being settled.

I have a hard time understanding why anyone would have a problem with the stated goals of Broader and Bolder. At the same time, I acknowledge that there is a great distance between good ideas and practical implementations and between envisioning and implementing. Since questions are echoing in my mind, I'll share them here.

All of these issues effect education, but are they education issues? Too often, policymakers determine that if something is a child issue, then it can just be rolled into education policy, killing two birds with one stone. Some of the additional “birds” are initiatives like child nutrition (breakfast and lunch), physical fitness, financial literacy, family life education (we don’t say sex), character education (but keep it value neutral, please), drug awareness, bullying prevention, internet safety, social equality, environmental awareness, heath screening, and childhood obesity.

While all of these are important issues, is the classroom or school where primary responsibility belongs for addressing them? Does the social activism emanating out of Washington sometimes usurp the role of parents, or does it simply acknowledge that “someone has to do it”?

Are we asking too much or too little of our schools? While acknowledging that “schools can’t do it alone” in the end, if we identify these things as education issues, do we, with the best of intentions, inadvertently demand that public education accept responsibility for fixing all of our societal problems? Does this diminish or enhance our schools' mandate to educate children?

If these become “education issues,” are policymakers going to have the courage and discipline to provide the resources necessary? Will other areas of government give education the authority to take leadership in implementation -- or will other agencies see schools as a method of delivery for their own programs, under their own control?

If childhood health and after-school care become education issues, does that imply absolution for everyone except the education community? If we are still waiting for full funding for IDEA and NCLB, what assurance do we have that the necessary money will ever be made available to address these other pressing (and expensive) issues? And finally, if we constantly hear concerns about the high cost of public education and the ROI on those public dollars, will shifting more social services to us add fuel to the misperception that we are spendthrifts?

As I read the profiles of the Broader and Bolder task force, I am sure that they have the expertise and knowledge to have foreseen and addressed (as best they can) many of my questions. But I couldn’t help but be disappointed, as I scanned the list, that K-12 classroom teachers weren't represented. I wonder if I would have been more or less enthusiastic if I had seen at least one practicing K-12 educator on that list?

"Teachers hold America’s future in their hands", or so they say. But sometimes what seems doable as theory (some assembly required) becomes a lot more complicated in reality once you’ve unpacked the box. I can’t help but wonder why, if teachers are that important to the future of our nation and if teachers are the single most important factor in student learning, we are so rarely invited to the table when the Bold begin envisioning new approaches to our professional work.

Everybody’s talking at me -- but what if teachers were participants in those formative discussions rather than audiences or topics? How bold would that be?

June 4, 2008

A Spelling Bee in My Bonnet

The 2008 Scripps National Spelling Bee is a Super Bowl of American academia, a place where 12-year-olds who can spell ophthalmoplegia are TV stars and spelling judges are hounded for autographs. -- The Washington Post

Two hundred and eighty-eight spellers came together to compete in a high stakes, high profile battle of etymology and Sameer Mishra, 13, emerged as the new champion. He was up against some formidable opponents, many of whom are repeat participants, but he had an inside track since his sister had been a three-time contestant and his coach.

The Bee made front page headlines. The final round was covered live by ESPN (they love statistics). ESPN's pre-Bee events included interviews with spellers and reviews of former final elimination words. What is it about a spelling bee that captures our imaginations? Is it the ecstasy of victory and the agony of defeat? Is it that we like to see a different kind of kid be a winner? Is it that we all remember standing in a line in sixth grade anticipating our turn?

Every performance of the musical The 25th Annual Putnam County Spelling Bee gives four audience members a chance to relive that sensation, bringing them into the cast -- a group of stereotypical competitive spellers. They are “different,” but they explain to us that they really aren’t different all in the same way. They "love spelling” because being good spellers gives them a sense of pride, identity and order during the angst of early adolescence.

As an educator, I guess the critical question is, “To what purpose?” Are these young people investing time and energy into competing at this level because they are building vocabulary skills? Do these students take on spelling because they enjoy the competition and they are good at it? Is memorization of proper spelling the intellectual calisthenics that expands their working memory and ability to recall information? Do they hope to take home scholarship money for future education? Or do they just want to hang out with like-minded kids?

Are spelling bees academic or archaic? Do they demonstrate thinking skills or memorization skills? Does the acquired learning achievement justify the require learning investment? Does a bee develop self confidence or create unnecessary stress? Is competitive spelling an intellectual pursuit or a sport?

Why not see if you have what it takes to spell competitively. Scripps Howard encourages you to test your spelling skill with the qualifying round of words. Go ahead and try.

I did okay, but I’m not going to tell you how many I got right. I will share this: I just used spell check to correct six words out of the approximately 500 words in this piece (spell check was one of the words that I misspelled). So is this whole piece loquacious (from Latin meaning wordy; garrulous) or perhaps galimatias (from the Greek meaning nonsense; gibberish)?

Well, I did just learn a new word. It may never became a ubiquitous part of my everyday speech, but sometimes it’s just fun to know things. Don’t you think?

Susan Graham

Susan Graham.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Advertisement

Categories

TM Archive