Certifiable?

Emmet Rosenfeld is an English teacher at Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology in Alexandria, Virginia. He has 13 years of experience as a teacher and writer. In this blog, he is chronicling his experiences as he works toward certification from the National Board of Professional Teaching Standards.

« October 2006 | Main | December 2006 »

November 26, 2006

Turkey


Stuff I told myself I was going to do over the Thanksgiving break
Write a fascinating blog post.
Respond to the folders from the GMU class I teach on Tuesday nights.
Knock out Entry Four.
Finish grading ninth grade essays.
Read The Way to Rainy Mountain.
Rake backyard leaves.

Reasons I didn’t do most of the stuff I was supposed to do
Pack and play for my nephew was set up in my office from Wednesday to Saturday.
Turkey Trot, 5 mile race through Del Ray on Thursday morning.
TG I for 18 at Mom and Dad’s on Thursday night.
Mount Vernon outing to see the canoe on Friday morning.
TG II at mother-in-law’s on Friday night.
TG III brunch at father-in-law’s on Saturday morning.
Brother-in-law’s birthday dinner at our house on Saturday night.
Neighbor’s kid’s mini golf birthday party on Sunday morning.
Curl up in fetal position with John Irving’s latest novel on Sunday night.

November 18, 2006

Tale of the Tape

I talk a lot. That’s one thing I realized when I watched the video of me leading a classroom discussion on Michener’s Chesapeake this week. At least, I talk a lot louder and clearer than any student in the room. Years of projecting my voice over noisy groups of kids seems to have left me with a positively operatic larynx.

This does not bode well for videotaping. The discussion itself was fairly balanced, really. Students had prepared by finding three passages in the book and making notes about how each illustrated one of eight “global themes,” like “political legitimacy and authority” or “development and diffusion of technology.”

Their comments, as usual with these gifted young people, were often perceptive. But you could only hear about a third of what they said. The boys were generally more audible than the girls, because of the bass in their voices. The impression a viewer of the tape is left with, I’m afraid, is that I’m basically conversating with myself.

I did learn some important stuff about how to make a tape. I was doing the same lesson two periods in a row. The first time, I had the camera on a tripod behind and to the right of me. My profile was at the left edge of the screen, and a ring of students in wooden one-armed bandits stretched in a graceful archipelago beside me. Unfortunately, it was less than half the kids, and as often as not, the speaker was off camera.

The second class, I moved the camera to a position near the door of the classroom, on my left as I sat in the circle. And I figured out how to crank up the tripod to a height of about six feet, so the camera was shooting slightly down on me and the kids. This time, I was on screen right, more of my face and hands visible, and a broader swathe of kids sitting around to my right and to my left. Of course, you could only see the backs of the heads of the ones on my left. Wouldn’t you know it, that’s where the girl who raises her hand more times than the rest of the class combined chose to plop her books.

As far as the sound quality, I guess I need to work on microphone placement. I hung an external mic from the bracing for the acoustic ceiling panels, carefully clipping the cord that ran back to the camera up and out of the shot. I placed the mic a few feet in front of me, hanging like a light bulb to capture all their good ideas. Next time, I guess it needs to go farther from me and somehow closer to them. Maybe I need to get a different kind of mic, one that picks up sound from all directions better than the one the library gave me.

One moment that the video tape did not capture was three quarters of the way through the second period, when my techno wiz helper spoke up in the middle of a heated debate about the destruction of a character named Tciblento, a Choptank princess and emblem of her people who is reduced to silence and misery at the hands of a series of ever more despicable men.

“Mr. R.,” he called out, eagerly waving his hand.

“Yes, Andrew,” I said, excited that a kid normally more interested in how to work the smart board was ready to share an opinion about literary pathos.

“Is that little red light on the camera over there supposed to be on right now? Cause it’s not.”

November 12, 2006

Caliban + 1

This Friday, my tenth graders presented final projects on the Tempest for an assignment I called “Caliban + 1.” Leading up to it, groups had taken notes on selected motifs during our reading of the play. Each group then had to select a single moment that involved Caliban and one or more other characters, and design a stage production around that scene to emphasize their assigned motif using costumes, lights and all the magic of the theater they could muster.

To show imprisonment, Jackie portrayed a doggish version of Caliban, with leaves and twigs in her “coat” and a collar from Prospero that she rips off her neck when she gets a new master. (Not to be confused with Blair, in the group on colonization. After a cue in the text describing Caliban’s appendages as fins, and maybe because the costume was lying around in his closet, he dressed like a shark.)

To demonstrate the escape afforded by sleep and dreams, Robby’s monster snoozed and imagined he was king of the island. Kami was a spirit who visited with sweet scents (a spray bottle) and tinkling tunes (a musical toy dinosaur), while both Caliban and the audience saw “untold riches” like succulent flowers and bags of gold projected on a white bed sheet hanging behind him.

To portray the theme of usurpation of a rightful ruler, Jessica’s Caliban crouched low to the ground and wore only black, proclaiming in a stentorian voice her intent to dethrone Prospero in stark contrast to the drunken antics of Stephano and Trinculo (who wore a red feather tucked into a rakish fedora made out of duct tape).

Dan’s group gave us a modern take on a “natural” Caliban uncorrupted by the “civilization” that turns Stephano and Trinculo into wannabe gangsters blinded by the bling of Prospero’s robes. As an added bonus, they somehow convinced the school’s principal to “shadow dance” on their video.

After the presentations, each group of students wrote responses to another group commenting on the selection of scenes, use of theatrical elements, and how effective they were in accentuating the selected motif.

I hope to use this project as one example of student work for Entry One, which asks for four responses each from two different students (two to writing assignments and two to reading assignments). For the reading assignments, one of the texts to which they respond must be written, and one needs to be non print, like a video or a piece of art. Also (if I’m reading the directions correctly) one of their responses to the reading must be written, and one of the responses must be in another form.

Anyway, I videotaped these presentations, and took digital pictures, and made notes. So one way or the other, I should be able to use them. But more important, I think the assignment worked: it showed the kids that a play is a vehicle for interpretation, and that the performance of it is what makes it come alive.

November 5, 2006

1, 2, 3

Oops. In obsessively writing 714 posts about Entry Four, I forgot to mention the other three entries that comprise the portfolio, each weighted at 16 percent of the total score (Entry Four is weighted at only 12 percent; the six assessment center exercises at the end are each 6.67 or a whopping 40 percent of the total). Here’s a quick overview (remember, the standards are specific to my certification area, Early Adolescence English Language Arts).

Entry One
Analysis of Student Growth in Reading and Writing

In thirteen pages or fewer, analyze four responses-- two reading assignments and two writing assignments-- from two different students. Include your “prompt,” their work, and the rubric or scoring criteria.

Assesses the following eight standards: I. Knowledge of Students; II. Knowledge of the Field; VI. Instructional Resources; VII. Instructional Decision Making; VIII. Reading; IX. Writing; XIII. Assessment; XIV. Self-Reflection.

Entry Two
Instructional Analysis: Whole Class Discussion

Video fifteen uninterrupted minutes of animated talk about an important topic, text or concept. Include up to eleven pages of commentary and no more than three pages of instructional materials (handouts, transparencies, an excerpt of what you’re reading?).

Assesses the following ten standards: I. Knowledge of Students; II. Knowledge of the Field; III. Engagement; IV. Learning Environment; V. Equity, Fairness, and Diversity; VI. Instructional Resources; VII. Instructional Decision Making; X. Speaking, Listening, and Viewing; XII. Integrated Instruction; XIV. Self-Reflection.


Entry Three
Instructional Analysis: Small Groups

Same as Entry Two above, except that instead of you and the class talking about something all together, the kids are working in groups of, for example, four or five students. The video should catch you moving about the room interacting with several groups briefly in this format.

Assesses the following ten standards (also the same as Entry Two): I. Knowledge of Students; II. Knowledge of the Field; III. Engagement; IV. Learning Environment; V. Equity, Fairness, and Diversity; VI. Instructional Resources; VII. Instructional Decision Making; X. Speaking, Listening, and Viewing; XII. Integrated Instruction; XIV. Self-Reflection.

Emmet Rosenfeld

Emmet Rosenfeld.

 Get RSS

Advertisement

Powered by
Movable Type 3.34

TM Archive