July 2011 Archives

July 26, 2011

Why I'm Marching: For Rigoberto


It's been fun this week, reading all the "Why I'm Marching" posts.

People are marching for the new teachers they work with, for their education-focused families and for their grandkids. They're marching for better curriculum and instruction, for equity and fairness. A whole lot of people have made it plain that they're sick to death of ineffective and omnipresent testing. Others are angry that control over decisions that should be made in schools and classrooms are now handed over to "experts."

Simply looking at the child poverty statistics recently released should make it very clear that the past decade of federal power-grabbing in education policy has not addressed real causes, and has actually made the symptoms worse.

Plenty to get exercised about, plenty of advocacy work ahead.

But I'm marching, on Saturday, for a man I never met, and whose story burned in the public consciousness for a few days, then faded: Rigoberto Ruelas.

Ruelas was the 5th grade teacher in Los Angeles whose life goals and achievements were reduced to this a public humiliation in the Los Angeles Times. When he took his own life, depressed, he became a footnote in the history of education "reform."

It's a hard thing, talking about Mr. Ruelas. His family and his school colleagues deserve privacy, and a chance to mourn. Making the case that Rigoberto was a victim of the corporate war on teachers feels like using cheap emotion to make a political point, the kind of low-rent sensationalism the Rupert Murdoch mastered years ago.

But I can relate to Rigoberto Ruelas. My grandfather was an immigrant, my father a first-generation American who didn't make it through high school. I was the first in my family to go to college--and my dad was enormously proud that his daughter became a teacher. A teacher!

I graduated from college in the early 70s, when it wasn't fashionable to walk in commencement exercises. But I did (with bell-bottom jeans and ratty peace-sign T-shirt under the cap and gown). My parents came up to watch, and after the ceremonies, my dad and I shut down the Holiday Inn bar, doing the polka.

I'm lucky. I got to build a teaching practice without worrying about standardized test scores and wrong-headed, "scientific" critiques of my work in a major newspaper. I never had a parent second-guess my work with their child, because they saw some numerical formula that questioned my effectiveness. I never had to worry whether welcoming kids with learning difficulties into my classroom, as Rigoberto did, would reflect negatively on my bottom line. I taught, mostly, in a world where teachers were respected.

Whenever I think of Rigoberto Ruelas, I am reminded of a tender and lovely passage in My Antonia, by Willa Cather--which I read at the suggestion of my high school English teacher. Ántonia's father, Mr. Shimerda, was a weaver and violinist, a man whose artistic talents were respected, and whose wages supported a family in the old country--Bohemia. Coming to America, however, he was ill-suited for life in the wilderness of Nebraska, and was repeatedly humiliated by his inability to succeed at what he wanted most to do, provide for his family. He takes his own life, and is buried in the dead of winter.

What follows is a prayer said by a neighbor, over Mr. Shimerda's rough new grave, and a lovely meditation on the mark left behind, a bit of human disorder, in a world ruled by measured homogeny:

"Oh, great and just God, no man among us knows what the sleeper knows, nor is it for us to judge what lies between him and thee."


Years afterward when the open-grazing days were over and the red grass had been ploughed under and under until it had almost disappeared from the prairie; when all the fields were under fence, and the roads no longer ran about like wild things, but followed the survey-section lines, Mr. Shimerda's grave was still there, with a sagging wire fence around it, and an unpainted wooden cross. Mrs. Shimerda never saw the roads going over his head. The grave, with its tall red grass that was never mowed, was like a little island.

I never came upon that place without emotion, and in all that country, it was the spot most dear to me. I loved the spirit that could not carry out the sentence--the error from the surveyed lines, the clemency of the soft earth roads along which the home-coming wagons rattled after sunset.
Never a tired driver passed the wooden cross, I am sure, without wishing well to the sleeper.

On Saturday, I will carry Mr. Ruelas' picture in my pocket, a little island of memory, a gentle dissent from the surveyed lines, in a world that values standardization over humanity.

See you Saturday, at the Save Our Schools March in D.C.

[Editorial note: Education Week Teacher is not affiliated with the Save Our Schools event; the views expressed in this opinion blog do not reflect the endorsement of Education Week or Editorial Projects in Education, which take no editorial positions.]

July 23, 2011

Conveyor Belt Schooling


The good news out of Louisiana this morning--via The Advocate, in Baton Rouge--is that state auditors have ordered a legislative oversight committee to review operations and fiscal records of LA charter schools. A growing series of red flags over NOLA-area charters have been raised, causing State Senator Ed Murray to note that "more and more of these issues [are] cropping up, not only with the finances but with performance as well."

A charter allows local groups to establish schools with taxpayer dollars but without the oversight of regularly elected school boards.

So what happens when public funding is used to educate kids, without democratically elected oversight? Answer: Take a look at southern Louisiana. The article references all kinds of unpleasant allegations, beginning with sexual abuse, and includes a semi-frantic quote from the LA Department of Ed, fretting about what will happen to Louisiana's status as the "national model" for charters.

In conversation with one of my favorite people, Phoebe Ferguson of the Plessy and Ferguson Foundation, who lives in New Orleans, she described the RENEW charter chain there. She mentioned a few of RENEW's publicized selling points--including compelling students to walk in straight lines, "like a conveyor belt," when passing through the hall.

We chuckled, wondering whether RENEW students would get T-shirts upon graduation: "I am a RENEW graduate! I am human capital!"

So I checked out their website--and Phoebe was right. Regimentation is the foundation of many of RENEW's points of pride:

• Not only do kids walk in conveyor belt lines everywhere they go--those lines are silent.
• No bathroom breaks until pre-set times, and then under supervision.
• No hall passes.
• No uniform violations, gum or sunflower seeds (RENEW says they "sweat the small stuff").
• Structured reward systems with "points and paychecks."
• All classrooms have the same bulletin board configuration.

RENEW calls this the school's "culture." It strikes me that this is similar to another very distinct culture: incarceration. Maybe RENEW assumes that students in poverty have only two life paths: compliant and productive worker, or straight to prison. So better Door #1 than a wasted life? Sad.

What about the things that really do matter--instruction, curriculum and learning? Besides a bunch more regimentation (mandated grading scale, totally standardized lessons, tracking, rigorous data analysis, daily homework required), RENEW advertises a series of things that should be taken for granted in all schools:

• Reading in all classes.
• Relationships with parents and families.
• Variety of teaching methods.

Are these things so unusual that they need to be promoted as part of a special, reformy culture?

Maybe it's just that conveyor belt image that bothers me. Davis Guggenheim portrayed schools as conveyor belts, where kids with flip-top heads were siphoned off into their personal knowledge-acquisition destinies. In Waiting-for-Superman World, the lucky kids got on the right conveyor belt and lived happily ever after, their heads brimming with testable information.

You can sell anything these days. Caveat emptor--and godspeed to that oversight team in Louisiana.

July 17, 2011

Let Them Eat P.I.E.

In the end, it's about crayons.

How many crayons does my child get? And how many do other children deserve, once my child gets all the colors he needs and wants--preferably in that spiffy box with the built-in sharpener?

From a thought-provoking blog at Learning First Alliance, about efforts to integrate Omaha Public Schools and make resource distribution more equitable:

Anecdote relayed by an OPS lawyer in conversation with a mother from a wealthier district: "If I understood correctly, you're telling me that my child has 10 crayons and these kids have no crayons. And you want us to give some of our crayons to those kids. Now that's probably fair. But as a parent, I'm never going to get behind anything that takes away my child's crayons."

Harvard sociologist William Julius Wilson, in The Truly Disadvantaged, makes the salient point that the seemingly intractable problems of the "ghetto underclass" (his phrase) can only be addressed by creating and emphasizing programs in which everyone--including advantaged groups--can participate and also benefit. Programs designed to "fix" the underclass, lifting them out of poverty, will have no long-term impact on building a more equitable society, unless they "enjoy the support and commitment of a broad constituency."

In other words, poor kids can have crayons, too, as long as my kids don't have to give up any of theirs. Because asking my kids to share their crayons--dividing them equally or using them together--runs counter to human nature.

Wilson's right, of course. The gap between our pretty-good public schools and truly disadvantaged schools won't close until there's something in those federal policies and programs for everyone.

Reformy organizations are all over that concept, these days--including this singularly disingenuous-to-the-point-of-nausea blog at Flypaper. Jamie Davies O'Leary suggests that what's in it for the advantaged is the nice, warm glow that comes from missionary work in a public school (plus a leg up into the graduate school of your choice when your two years are up).

How do we compel people to care? Compelling stories, says the tautologically inclined Ms. O'Leary. She suggests watching The Wire, which compelled her to "more than normal" crying, during grad school. Plus, of course, supporting Teach for America which "sensitizes" its corps members to the "plight of inner-city education"--and "puts a human face on issues of educational inequity." O'Leary doesn't say whose human face represents inequity, but presumably it's one of those cute minority kids in plaid charter-school jumpers you see in the StudentsFirst spots--$200 million will buy you a lot of compelling advertising shots.

There's a great deal of cringe-worthy "grappling with this issue" in the blog--which freely employs the reformy equivalent of the royal "we:"

Most of us don't know about the "other America" reflected in The Wire, in North Camden, East Columbus or in pockets all across the country. Once you meet characters who live it each day - whether via your flat screen, a book or article, or in person via volunteering and getting involved - your worldview will shift.

How can "we" best help these "characters" and shift our worldview? Through the organizations in the PIE Network, O'Leary says: Stand for Children, StudentsFirst, TFA.

But we don't want them in "our" schools, touching our crayons:

Poor kids do need different schools, not because they're poor, but because they tend not to get the background knowledge at home that the more affluent kids tend to get with home lives that are book- and language-rich.

I think we've all had enough "compelling" reform. Time to tell our own stories.

Because kids in Detroit--and lots of other places-- don't have any crayons. And all kids deserve crayons.

July 11, 2011

Signs of Passion


A thousand people in the street
Singing songs and carrying signs
Mostly say, hooray for our side.

Buffalo Springfield


Two purposes for this post:

#1) To inform those who will be rallying at the Save Our Schools March on July 30 in D.C. to:

a) Bring their own sign, expressing their personal passion over what's happened to public schooling in America, their children's learning--or the concept of building a strong society through democratic equality.

OR

b) Be assured that there will be materials available at the SOS Conference and on the Ellipse before the Rally, to create an extemporaneous cardboard missive.

(And of course, being teacher-types, we want to remind everyone to properly dispose of signs afterward, be courteous to those around you, and always do your homework.)

#2) To think about the key reasons involved in marching on the nation's Capitol--and the range of messages those reasons might generate.

You have to be pretty angry--and convinced that things are seriously headed in the wrong direction, a runaway train of bad "reform"--to show up in Washington D.C. in the middle of the thick, steaming summer and demonstrate. Everyone has a triggering passion, and those furies are diverse. The Save Our Schools movement is fed by many streams, and is not ideologically pure. It's a kind of "big tent"--with the common value of certainty that the current policy direction is grievously wrong, and must be stopped.

So--there are lots of things that could appear on signs:

  • Pleas for sanity on rampant, unnecessary testing that does nothing to improve instruction or learning, but is filling the coffers of testing companies.
  • Worries about losing curriculum tailored to real kids and real towns as the Common Core Everything sweeps across the nation (prodded by federal RTTT dollars).
  • Anger over publicly funded (but privately supported) charters scooping up kids and resources that belong to communities.
  • Righteous indignation over the move to dump experienced (and more costly) veteran teachers in favor of two-year adventure teachers.
  • Demands to return decision-making to those closest to kids and classroom: parents, teachers, school leaders, the community.
  • Skepticism about top-down, mandated reforms that haven't produced solid evidence of success--by any measures.

Or how about: More Cowbell! Less Arne Duncan!

Last Friday night, three student activists--Amy Mayfield and Erika Redlinger of CA, who are preparing to become professional teachers, and Ammaarah Khan, a HS student from NJ--presented a dynamic Save Our Schools webinar.

Ammaarah told the story of her parents, who emigrated from Pakistan in the 1980s, searching for the best place to live so that their children could receive a top-flight public education--something that wasn't available to them in Pakistan.

Ammaarah's family is bitterly disappointed in what has happened to the jewel that drew them to this country: a free, high-quality education. They believed it was worth disruption and hardship to come to a country founded on the new idea that all kids--not just the ones with inside info, resources and a low lottery number--deserved equal opportunity. They're especially dismayed by staggering cuts in the New Jersey schools and all the rich programming they took for granted that's been hacked away. "I use school to become me!" Ammaarah said.

That would make an amazing sign. Wouldn't it?

What would--or will--your sign say?

July 05, 2011

Saving the Family Business

Today's guest post is by Claudia Swisher, beloved English teacher and inspirational reading guru of Norman, Oklahoma.

Why am I marching? I'm trying to save the family business. My husband is a retired 252365_10150196376392816_630357815_7678675_5662676_n.jpgteacher; his mother was a teacher. My father was a teacher. His mother and father were both teachers. My mother's grandfather was a teacher. My son and his wife are teachers. Two of my four granddaughters have shown interest in becoming teachers. I march because I fear greatly for this profession that has marked my family indelibly.

My father was my principal in junior high...he once substituted in my English class. I'm still traumatized. My dad's mother was his English teacher - I can only imagine! His father was his principal in high school. On the wall of my classroom is my father's high school diploma, signed by my grandfather. They're both there with me every day as I teach.

I march because the family business is under attack. Smug bureaucrats who've never stood in front of a hostile class of non-readers, or a fidgety group of kindergartners just before lunch are now calling the shots in education, at the national level, and in my own state of Oklahoma.

When did the Billionaire Boys' Club get their education degrees? Where did they intern in the classroom? Why is their voice valued over mine?

I just finished my thirty-sixth year in the classroom. I have taught every level in public education, kindergarten through seniors. I've taught in three states, in seven schools, for ten different principals. I'm a National Board Certified Teacher, renewed until 2020. I have a master's degree, a reading specialist, and hours in special education past my masters.

When did my voice and my experience become a liability? Why does the world believe Bill Gates and not me? Why do my letters to my legislators and my own State Superintendent of Public Instruction get ignored?

I am marching to join my voice with others as committed as I am to a quality education for every student, not just students whose parents can afford to buy homes in "good" school districts, or even afford to send them to private schools. Every child, every day, deserves the best teachers, the best schools, the best administrators. My daughter-in-law teaches elementary music in a school that is 99% free-and-reduced-lunch. These children deserve and receive her best every day. These students are the consumers of my family business.

I'm marching to draw attention to the horrifying abuse of standardized testing in the nation and in my own state of Oklahoma, where all third graders now must read at grade level, teachers will be evaluated partially on student scores, and schools will be graded based on the same scores.

I remember when we took a test at the end of the school year, the results went into our permanent file, and perhaps, someone compares scores from previous tests, and that was the end. Now, however, the testing industry has taken over education. Now, instead of teaching, we prepare students for tests. Now, instead of learning, students prepare for these tests.

In my state, just this year new laws are being enacted that will retain any third grader who does not read at level on one test, one day. Teachers will be evaluated on students' scores on that one test, one day. And schools will be graded according to the scores of one test, one day. Legislators enacted some of the most repressive laws, and now they leave schools and teachers to figure out how to make all these mandates work.

We know what will happen: curricula will narrow, recesses will be shortened. Instruction will cease as we all chase the all-important scores. Even though we as educators know the scores are not a true measure of learning or of teaching.

I'm marching to make the point to my granddaughters that there will be an honorable profession for educators when they graduate from college. If they choose to join the family business, it will still be there for them, as it was for me.

The last time I visited with my father we found a little hole-in-the-wall lunch room in Southern Indiana. As we sat and had really bad coffee, an equally elderly man approached my dad and asked, "Are you C.B. Lisman's son? He was my geometry teacher. He helped me understand that class." Then these two old men sat and laughed about their high school careers in tiny New Lebanon High School, their faces lit up while talking about a teacher. That's what I want for my son and daughter-in-law. That's what I want for my granddaughters.

That's why I'm marching in Washington, D.C. on July 30 with the Save Our Schools movement.

July 03, 2011

The Real Education Nation

I must study politicks and war that my sons may have liberty to study mathematicks and philosophy. My sons ought to study mathematicks and philosophy, geography, natural history, naval architecture, navigation, commerce and agriculture in order to give their children a right to study painting, poetry, music, architecture, statuary, tapestry, and porcelain.

Happy Independence Day, fellow ed-travelers!

Are you wondering what John Adams might have had to say about ceramics and cheerleading? About what matters most, as we roll over into Year Two Hundred Thirty-Five in the Land of the Free? Me. too. Have JohnAdams.jpgwe achieved Adams' mature educational peak yet, where all our students can learn for learning's sake, and live the enlightened life? Are we Education Nation?

Over at Teachers' Letters to Obama, we've been kicking around the question of whether lousy movies (like Bad Teacher) and cheesy TV shows influence public opinion. Commenter Greta notes that she's never been in a gang and doesn't know any gang members, so what she thinks about gangs might be influenced by what she sees in movies and TV. That's the way it works.

I've never worked in an emergency room, either--do I think Nurse Jackie's workplace resembles reality? Maybe. I can tell you with certainty that music teachers--at least those with a union contract--get more due process than poor Will Shuester, who seems to lose his job at least four times a season for no good reason (speaking of cheerleading). But that's because I'm a music teacher. I have a first-hand knowledge base. I don't need a TV show to enlighten me.

Greta also notes that she's smart enough to filter this "information" through a healthy skepticism of the media, both fiction and serious news reporting, but her observation begs the question: Where we do get our collective impressions about public schools in America? Not only what schools are like now--but what they could and should be, and how to make them better?

Last fall, NBC set out to tell us all we needed to know about public education in America with the brilliantly titled Education Nation. They collected media and entrepreneurial "experts," set up tents in Rockefeller Plaza and planned a whole week of soft-core news programming and panel discussions.

But something went wrong for the network: reality intervened. Teachers, parents and school leaders started wondering out loud just whose point of view (and what other high-profile media projects) NBC was promoting.

NBC hastily set up a one-hour prequel "just for teachers," the MSM equivalent of giving educators donuts and coffee plus a nice mug before sending them back to the classroom to work miracles, while the real leaders made decisions. NBC stacked the audience deck, shuffled articulate teachers with market-driven mouthpieces and overlooked key issues on what's gone wrong in the real Education Nation. Low point: Brian Williams gratuitously suggesting that teachers were avoiding the "elephant in the room"--Waiting for Superman--when that elephant was never more than a gauzy figment of some hedge fund manager's imagination.

NBC had little clue what effective public schools looked like--or their potential, given an updated mission, parent participation, real leadership and equitable funding. They had little incentive to flesh that vision out. Nor did they spend time looking at first-rate public schools as a exciting models.

Instead, NBC decided they were Education Nation, unions were Education Ossification and veteran teachers were Miseducation Causation. It was, as they say in show business, a resonant story arc.

Similar to the resonant story arc the British promoted, 235 years ago: We're the ones who bought and paid for this country--ragtag "revolutionaries" should just shut up and pay taxes. Independent governance? Ha! You people couldn't run a failing blacksmith shop! Show me the data that says you should be trusted to run your own nation!

Maybe the Brits should have listened to the wisdom of citizens who'd been living in the American backwoods for a century and a half. Perhaps NBC should have listened to those closest to the classroom--teachers, parents, students and real school leaders--instead of corporate funders hoping to profit off the undeveloped wilderness of the education marketplace.

The Save Our Schools Movement and its guiding principles represent the real Education Nation--a loosely organized grassroots coalition, fighting for control over what we care about most: our very real children and their prospects for living a good life in America. We are heartily sick of pre-packaged Education Disinformation, and willing to take some real risks and speak up.

When I read John Adams' words, the first thought that came to mind was: This is the real shared sacrifice-- investing now for payoff to future generations.

Ten generations after John Adams, it's still about politics and war.

Wishing you a splendid Fourth. Think about joining us in the real Education Nation.

Views expressed in this blog are strictly those of the author and do not reflect the endorsement of Education Week or Editorial Projects in Education, which take no editorial positions.

Follow This Blog

Advertisement

Most Viewed On Teacher

Recent Comments

Archives

Categories