It's a fine line between being creative to meet kids' needs and seeing education as open marketplace.
Thinking about packets (and their progenitor, worksheets) and why educators speak of them in the same tone Jerry Seinfeld uses for "Newman."
What do teachers really want? Influence. Respect. To have their expertise taken seriously and vlaued in the creation of education policies and programs.
Secret groups to fix problems in education are not democratic. Nor are they innovative.
Self-analysis is--explicitly--what we hope all teachers will do, and what good teaching "looks like."
We trust policy, but we don't trust teachers.
Wouldn't it be great if there were a guide for legislators to making useful education policy? Here it is.
There is little evidence that actual learning--the useful kind that sticks--can be linked to some kind of Amazing Teacher Fairy Dust.
As a nation, we still have no clue, let alone consensus, about the purpose of public education. Is it building democratic equality? Job training? Credential collecting?
Something important is lost when kids assume that mom will always play backstop to any academic negligence.