The Misrepresentation of Science
Eric Brunsell over at Edutopia says it's spooky how badly we're mis-teaching science in schools:
A few days ago, I received an e-mail from a commercial science supply company with a list of neat Halloween "experiments." I couldn't help but be irritated as I read through the directions. Sure, they were fun activities, but experiments? Nothing was being tested. The explanations claimed that the reactions were "magical." They are shallow activities that horribly misrepresent the process of science. I should let it slide because it is Halloween. However, the reality is that I run across these types of "experiments" from commercial vendors and web-based lesson collections almost daily.
He says that textbooks explain the "scientific method" as a linear process with defined stepsproblem, hypothesis, experimentation, observation, and conclusion. But science, in reality, is "a highly creative, dynamic, social and human endeavor," Brunsell claims.
Students should learn how real scientists conduct their investigationswhich is rarely by doing methodical experiments alone in a room, he argues. More often, scientists collaborate, raise questions, repeat steps, and tap into their creative intelligence.