« Kids Today ... | Main | Molding Student Brains in the Tech Era »

Wikipedia Is Not a Real Source—Or Is It?

Over at ZDNet, ed-tech consultant Chris Dawson makes a case for allowing kids to use Wikipedia—the free open-source encyclopedia that many teachers ban students from using—for classroom assignments.

This plea doesn't apply to the teachers (or administrators, for that matter) who have figured out that Wikipedia is an incredible knowledge store, cornucopia of primary sources, and go-to site for most the free world. Rather, this plea is for those who, instead of teaching students about Internet site credibility, fact checking, verification, and crowdsourcing, choose to simply prohibit the use of Wikipedia.

He admits that encouraging kids to use a site without much filtering is scary. But that comes with the territory, he claims, when you let kids use the Internet at all. Plus, he says:

You know what Wikipedia has that the nether regions of the Internet do not, though? Citations. References. Links to further reading and verifiable primary sources. And when it doesn't, it has a nice little box at the top of the entry explaining why it doesn't meet Wikipedia standards.

The major problem with Wiki prohibition, though, is pretty straightforward, he asserts: "We all use it anyway."

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Follow This Blog


Most Viewed On Teacher



Recent Comments