November 2009 Archives

November 10, 2009

Report from NAGC - Day 3

Greetings, once again! :o) I'm home now and here is the report for Day 3. With all the learning and all the fun that I squeezed into these very long days, I hit my limit that night and couldn't maintain my energy to stay awake and write. It's therefore a tad belated, but here is (my) Day 3 in a nutshell:

1) Saturday began quite early for me with the Affiliate Breakfast. The Affiliates are all of the state gifted associations and each year NAGC has a breakfast get-together for the affiliate leaders. As President of Montana AGATE, that meant me this year.

P1070649 2.jpg No people appear in this picture because I somehow managed to show up 20 minutes early (6:40 a.m.)! It's always interesting to meet people in leadership positions in their own states and to "compare notes" and share ideas.

2) Next came Howard Gardner's keynote, a reflection on his ideas (particularly that of multiple intelligences). He talked about the importance of individualizing as much as possible for students and reaching them via multiple avenues.

3) Just prior to each keynote, local kids provided entertainment as everyone walked into the giant room. Well, just before Gardner's keynote, a girl from the Missouri Scholars Academy blew everyone away with her poetry slam. Her delivery was well-polished, the content of her poem was highly relevant, and her message was crafted with remarkable creativity. The wowed audience of nearly 3,000 teachers and parents gave her an instant cheering standing ovation the moment she finished. It was phenomenal and I saw people with tears in their eyes, too. They told us she was on YouTube, so I found the clip and here it is for you to see (although this version shows a classroom performance that isn't quite as polished as she was on Saturday - but it's still great). Click the image to view the video -

The text of her poem is posted at the Missouri Scholars Academy website. Way to go, Taylor!

4) NAGC President Ann Robinson was interviewed on a St. Louis morning TV show and we saw the clip before the keynote, too. I'm really impressed with how thoroughly St. Louis reached out to NAGC during our time in town. We were welcomed in a variety of ways by many friendly people :o)

P1070652 2.jpg 5) Saturday, NAGC conducted its first Virtual Convention, which was a series of that day's sessions being dually offered online, live, so that participants who couldn't make it to St. Louis could still participate to some degree. What a timely idea! If any of you participated in the virtual convention, I'd be interested in hearing about your experience. (The Virtual Convention was graciously sponsored by Prufrock Press.) Here you can see the computers that were set up to broadcast each presenter's voice and PowerPoint slides live over the internet:

P1070687 2.jpg 6) After the keynote, I attended a session about building work ethic and resilience in our students and why they don't have much of either any more. Our "microwave, disposable society" is full of quick answers, quick fixes, and quick eliminations of what we don't want. Plus, a lot is given to or done for kids nowadays that they used to have to earn or work for themselves. The presenter suggested building the following traits in kids in order to foster their development of resiliency and work ethic:
* social competence
* communication skills
* autonomy
* sense of purpose and future

7) Next, I listened to a few researchers talk about their study of friendships and gifted kids, including the role (if any) of competition in those friendships. They found evidence that indicates gifted kids' friendships are perhaps more specialized (they have certain friends for certain reasons, rather than all-purpose friends). Their research also indicated that gifted kids' friendships were more likely to include "competition for fun" rather than competition to "beat" the other person.

8) "Procrastination: Pathways to Productivity" was a fascinating presentation by Joanne Foster. I remember hearing Maureen Neihart once say that perfectionism was a bit like cholesterol - there's a good kind and a bad kind. And that was essentially a good piece of what Joanne was saying about procrastination, too - that there's a good kind and a bad kind. (She didn't put it that way, but it struck me as an element of her message.) She talked about reasons people (especially gifted kids) procrastinate:
* they don't know how to ask for help when they're stuck (because they so often don't need to ask for help - and then when they do need to they don't know how to or are afraid to look "stupid")
* they're overwhelmed by too much to do or by the bigness of the task
* they see it as an unpleasant or uninteresting task
* they are more energized or inspired by a looming deadline
* they are afraid they won't be able to do it perfectly or to the level they so easily do other things.
And she also talked about ways to help gifted kids overcome their unhealthy procrastination - by helping them learn how to do the following:
* focus attention on what matters
* develop persistence
* learn relaxation techniques to help manage stress
* develop and nurture a mastery orientation (rather than a "always the best" orientation)
* analyze and harness what their own approaches to productivity are
Why do you procrastinate? What motivates you?

9) Sshhh... Don't tell anyone, but I skipped a session on Saturday so I could dash off to go up the arch!

t P1070660.jpg u P1070667.jpg v P1070656.jpg w P1070684.jpg

That last photo is the arch's full shadow as seen from the top. I can't take credit for noticing it. A boy looking out the window next to me tapped me on the shoulder and said, "Hey, lady, look! You can see the whole shadow!" I complimented him on making such a great observation :o)

10) The late afternoon session on Saturday was a conversation between Dean Keith Simonton and Howard Gardner about creative lives and their different opinions on the nature and nurture of creativity. I was struck by Simonton's engaging nature and easy laugh and it was fun to watch the two of them "rib" each other good-naturedly about their respective ideas. (This session was graciously sponsored by the Scholastic Testing Service.)

P1070694 2.jpg 11) I enjoyed dinner on Day 3 with three of my classmates from our Masters program at UConn. We talked for a few hours, sharing ideas about what we're doing with our students and discussing what we had learned so far at the conference. One of them is a state department coordinator of professional development for teachers in Illinois and she recently developed a new 45-hour PD course for Illinois teachers that will give them a very comprehensive basis in information about and strategies for gifted students. In addition to awesome content, I was blown away by the format of it. It is a radical transformation of PD and I've never seen anything like it before. Combining new technologies and multiple adaptable features, it adjusts to the participants, records their thoughts and lessons, and incorporates both computer-based and face-to-face interactions for each activity. It's AMAZING and I regret that my description can't do it justice. I have the kind of job where I get blown away quite often, but this had my jaw hanging on the floor. It might even still be lying on the floor by her computer. Watching her demonstrate the program for us, I felt like I was witnessing the birth of something BIG. Illinois teachers, you are in for quite an experience!

And that was all just ONE DAY! I think I need some rest, especially after returning to two 12-hour work days (parent/teacher conferences Monday and Tuesday until 8:00 each night) on the heels of the convention. But, as Helen Hayes once said, "If you rest, you rust."

Check back for a report on Day 4! Remember to answer the question under #8 above about procrastination if you're interested...

November 06, 2009

Report from NAGC - Day 2

Has it really been just two full days that I've been here?! It already feels like a week! (That's a good thing - it's just intense!) I'm typing at a table in a restaurant with some friends from other states because they peer pressured me into staying out later with them rather than going back to my room to write. I so love re-connecting with everyone here and meeting great new faces, too.

P1070613 2.jpg

My day in a nutshell:

1) I learned some great tips about approaching legislators about gifted education issues from a former gifted specialist who is now a member of the Missouri legislature. Here's a sampling:
* Condense your information into about three simple and compelling talking points.
* If they can't read it in 90 seconds, it won't be read. (one sheet of paper with points bolded)
* Build relationships - find something you have in common to initially connect with them on.
* They need to like you and see you as influential.
* Connect with the decision makers and those who represent you.
* Focus on services for gifted children, not programs (because the purpose of programs is often misunderstood)
(Thank you, Sarah Lampe!)

2) Spent some time shopping in the Exhibit Hall...

P1070631 2.jpg

3) Marveled at origami created with paper plates...

P1070636 2.jpg

4) Learned about executive functioning processes in the brain...

5) Learned about American Mensa via lunch conversation...

6) Gathered ideas for a student of mine who is building a Rube Goldberg contraption. (One of the presentations focused on strategies for teaching thinking skills, simple machines, and engineering & physics principles to kids via the building of Rube Goldberg contraptions.)

7) Pondered what gifted kids really mean when they say something is "fun" ...

8) Attended a couple different receptions (face-to-face social and professional networking!)

9) Discussed the state of gifted education in Montana with a handful of other Montana GT specialists (there are only a handful of us anywhere...)

10) Talked with a doctoral student about her dissertation and shared ideas...

11) Had a photo op with four of my classmates from UConn -- the first time all five of us have been together at the same time since 2003.

12) And in the last session I attended this afternoon, I watched a really fired up presenter, Susan Rakow, give a feed-it-to-them-straight presentation about all those things in gifted education we all know deep down but rarely are gutsy enough to actually say (especially to people outside of gifted education). Her top 10 list of "things you can't say in gifted education" included "anti-intellectualism is the norm in the U.S." and "all children are NOT gifted." I found myself jotting down lots of gems she was saying, such as "giftedness is real and we need to stop apologizing for it" and "the glorification of stupidity." She talked about this "placation polka" we dance in order to soothe people's feelings or not step on any toes. And she said, "well sure, we retard them [gifted kids] for five years" in response to the common misperception that "the other kids will catch up."

Although my style is not quite so feed-it-to-them-straight, I think she's right that we have elephants in the room and don't confront or acknowledge important realities in our field. What do you see as the "things we can't say in gifted education"?

November 05, 2009

Report from NAGC - Day 1

My first full day of the NAGC convention has concluded and I already have enough ideas to take home to keep me hopping for a while! (Yet there are still three days to go!) I'm hoping to squeeze in enough time to share some of what I'm learning with you during the week while I'm here.

The view from my hotel window is gorgeous :o)

Arch.jpg

And the city of St. Louis has done a great job of welcoming us here. The restaurant I ate at tonight was a fair number of blocks from the Convention Center and even there (all over, really!) we found one of the little "Welcome NAGC" signs:

P1070624 2.jpg

And about every other street light has a little welcome sign on it too:

P1070627 2.jpg

Today (Thursday) were the Board Institutes, which are in-depth sessions presented by NAGC Board members. This morning, I attended the session by Julia Link Roberts on product assessment and this afternoon I attended the session about NAGC's new Mile Marker Series (which I plan to write about in more depth in a future post).

This morning's session began with an important and thought-provoking question: "If during the first five or six years of school, a child earns good grades and high praise without having to make much effort, what are all the things he doesn't learn that most children learn during those years?"

(Take a moment to ponder that for a bit...)

In our ensuing conversation, we shared multiple possibilities, such as:
* the child might not be learning persistence
* the child might not be developing a work ethic
* the child might not be encountering struggles that foster resilience
* the child might not be learning healthy strategies for dealing with frustration (which I've talked about here a bit before)
* the child might not be learning how to maintain a sense of curiosity
* the child might not be developing an accurate sense of his/her true abilities/potential
* the child might not experience a sense of satisfaction when actually achieving
* the child might lose pride in his/her work
* the child might not be developing time management skills or study skills
* the child might not be learning how to break an academic sweat (and therefore doesn't grow or improve in the ways we do when we "break a sweat")
* (click here and scroll to page 17 for a great article by Tracy Inman on this topic)

Now, granted, kids can learn these life skills via multiple avenues -- it doesn't just have to be in school that they learn them. However, school is certainly a BIG part of kids' lives and can have a significant impact on their opportunities to learn (or not learn) these important life skills. We hurt kids in the short term and in the long term if we cheat them out of opportunities to learn these life skills. Providing appropriate academic challenge for each learner is one ideal way to help kids develop and nurture these skills.

What is your answer to the question? What do you think our gifted kids don't learn if/when we allow them to skate through school?

November 01, 2009

Survey Results

Awhile back, I posted a link to a little survey that many of you completed for me. The purpose of today's post is to update you on the results (as previously promised due to the problem I had getting the survey system to link the results for all of you). I've taken screen shots of the results page in my Advanced Survey account and cropped them into individual JPEG images, which you can view below. Thank you to those who took the survey!


Survey Question #1 75.jpg

I am intrigued that the percentage of parents reading this blog is so high. Granted, since I limited the responses to that question to just one answer per person, the results don't reflect the number of people who fill more than one role, and that likely is many of you. Still, I'm glad to know that there are so many parents out there reading because it helps me know that I perhaps need to gear things to the parents a little more often!


Survey Question #2 90.jpg

Interestingly, the results to the above question have changed over time. Initially, when the survey was first posted, the responses to Question #2 were running about 75% "Yes" for subscribing to this blog via RSS or a similar feed -- probably because as subscribers they knew right away that a new post was up, whereas the non-subscribers gradually found it over time.


Survey Question #3 75.jpg

Even though I did allow multiple selections for the answers to Question #3, most people who responded only chose one or two answers each, hence the low percentages of interested folks for each topic. I'm fairly surprised that there isn't broader interest for more topics. (Of course, for me they're all interesting, but I'm also a bit of a geek for this stuff!)


Survey Question #4.jpg

I was disappointed to not hit all 50 states, although there are a couple states not represented that I do know I have readers in because I know people there offline who tell me they read this blog (Alaska, Idaho, and North Dakota, for example). And to the handful of you who claim to be living at Antarctica, I'd be really curious to know why you're there! (assuming you weren't just giving a silly response)


Survey Question #5 75.jpg

Wow, most of you are regular readers. I appreciate knowing I have a consistent audience and I hope I can (continue to?) do my best at offering you interesting, thought-provoking, fairly regular reading. And welcome to the many newbies!

If any of you didn't take the survey and would like to add your two cents to it, just follow these easy steps:

1. Go to Advanced Survey
2. Type my survey # into the little "Take a Survey" box on the right side of the page. Survey # is 69305.
3. Click "Go" and answer the five easy questions. (*Thank you!!!*)

Have a great week! I'm excited to be heading to St. Louis for the national convention and I hope to see some of you at NAGC this week! :o)

Follow This Blog

Advertisement

Archives

Recent Comments

  • Andromeda: I procrastinate because...I'm really kinda lazy? ;) And because historically read more
  • kcab: Tamara, I have a follow-up question on the topic of read more
  • Nikki: Thank you so much for posting this. We referenced your read more
  • Elaine Wellborn: I like your analogy of procrastination and good/bad cholesterol. That read more
  • Frank Hilton: Tamara, Thank you for your post. Two years have gone read more

Most Viewed On Teacher

Categories