« Here's How Sen. Kamala Harris Wants to Raise Teacher Pay | Main | DeVos Says Trump Budget Means 'Freedom' in Education; Democrats Call It 'Cruel' »

Analysis Raises Fresh Questions on How Some ESSA Plans Handle Vulnerable Students

ESSA-letters-600x292-Getty.jpgStates and districts are starting to flag schools where subgroups of students are underperforming under the Every Student Succeeds Act. But advocates are concerned that they might miss some schools that need serious help because of the way their ESSA plans are designed.

So is that happening? It appears to be. But, so far, it's in a very small subset of states, an analysis by the Alliance for Excellent Education, a research and advocacy organization that works to ensure students graduate from high school prepared for college and the workforce. 

According to the Alliance, Arkansas and Connecticut might be missing some schools where subgroups of students—English-language learners, students in special education, racial minorities, and disadvantaged students—are performing as poorly as the students in the worst schools in the state. And it's unclear if Michigan, Virginia, and Wisconsin are in the same boat.

Here's why: ESSA requires states to flag schools for "comprehensive support and intervention" (the bottom 5 percent of schools in the state, plus where fewer than two-thirds of students graduate) and "additional targeted support and intervention" (those where at least one subgroup of vulnerable students is struggling as much as the bottom 5 percent). States also must flag another category of schools where subgroups aren't performing well for "targeted support and intervention," but they have much more leeway on how to define what that means.

Some states decided to pick their "additional targeted support" schools, from among their "targeted support schools." That's kosher under ESSA. The problem: In at least a couple states, the definition of "targeted support" means fewer schools will be flagged because the state's definition of "targeted support" is narrower than the definition of "additional targeted support."

That's problematic, because students in those schools will miss out on extra help from the state and district, write Lindsay Dworkin is director of policy development and state government relations and Anne Hyslop is assistant director of policy development and government relations in a blog post.

"A central value underlying ESSA is that every student should have the opportunity to succeed," they write. "A key way the law advances that goal is requiring improvement efforts in schools when even one subgroup of students is struggling, even if the overall student population does not." 

Don't miss another Politics K-12 post. Sign up here to get news alerts in your email inbox.

Follow us on Twitter at @PoliticsK12.

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Follow This Blog


Most Viewed on Education Week



Recent Comments