« Study: Physics-Teacher Prep System 'Mostly Incoherent' | Main | It's Back to the Drawing Board for Draft N.C. Standards »

Cato Institute Study Finds Weak Case for Common Standards

Forty-eight states have signed on to support the development of common academic standards. But they may be supporting something that doesn't have much evidence of effectiveness in improving learning, according to a new paper from a think tank here in Washington.

In a policy analysis released today, Neal McCluskey, the associate director of the Center for Educational Freedom at the Cato Institute, argues that the case for a set of standards shared by all states is empirically weak. In "Behind the Curtain: Assessing the Case for National Curriculum Standards," he argues that expanding educational choice is a more effective way to improve schools, and he touches on some of the arguments and research that support that view.

(McCluskey uses the term "national standards" to refer to the current initiative to develop standards shared by all states. Well aware that previous movements to develop national standards have met with resistance from those who oppose a strong federal role in education, organizers of the current initiative call them "common standards," and point out that they are being shaped by the states, not the federal government.)

In his paper, McCluskey analyzes the research base for national standards and finds it weak. He points out—as did my colleague Sean Cavanagh in his overview of the standards debate for our special issue of Quality Counts this year—that while some countries with national standards perform better than the United States does, and some don't.

McCluskey argues the case against national standards in this article from last year, as well, as does Cato colleague Andrew J. Coulson in this one.

The National Governors Association and the Council of Chief State School Officers, which are organizing the common standards movement, explore the case for such standards in their Joint International Benchmarking Report. You might also want to take a look at a cluster of interesting commentaries on various sides of the common-standards issue in our Quality Counts report.

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.


Most Viewed on Education Week



Recent Comments

  • Linda: My problem with homework is they give too much and read more
  • Seo Article Writer: Hello I just see your site when I am searching read more
  • Car Insurance Guy: Ah!!! at last I found what I was looking for. read more
  • cyptoreopully: Hey there everyone i was just introduceing myself here im read more
  • Connie Wms: Good grief. We have gone round and round forever with read more