« Blog on Break | Main | Will a New Reading Program Improve ELLs' Literacy in L.A.? »

Feds Settle With Arizona in Dispute Over ELL Programs


From guest blogger Debra Viadero:

The U.S. departments of Justice and Education have put out the word today that they've reached a settlement with Arizona education officials in a dispute over the state's programs for English-language learners.

In letters mailed to state officials over the summer, federal civil rights officials said they had determined that some of the practices the state uses to identify and serve ELL students violate federal law. They cited two practices in particular: the surveys schools and districts give to parents to initially identify students to be tested for ELL services, and the process by which ELLs are reclassified as fluent in English.

The press release, issued late Friday afternoon by the Education Department, focuses on the Home Language Survey. It notes that, before July 2009, the state used three questions to screen potential ELL students for testing. They were:

• "What is the primary language used in the home regardless of the language spoken by the student?"
• "What is the language most often spoken by the student?"
• "What is the language that the student first acquired?"

State officials changed the survey that year, however, to ask only about students' primary language. After the change, the number of ELL students being served across the state dropped by 33,000 from the previous year, to 100,000, according to federal officials. They said the one-question survey was at least partly to blame because it failed to identify eligible students.

Under the terms of the settlement, the state agreed to go back to using the three-question survey. State educators will also be required to refer a student for testing if a parent's response to any of those questions is in Spanish. The Arizona Department of Education also agreed to drop a teacher-referral process that federal officials said was unnecessarily delaying services to students.

Mary Ann has written extensively on this investigation, as well as a court case, known as Horne v. Flores, that also centers on the state's ELL programs. No doubt she will weigh in with a more authoritative interpretation when she's back in the office.

CORRECTION: This post has been corrected to say that the reduction in the number of students identified after the change from three questions to one was 33,000, according to the U.S. Department of Education.

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Follow This Blog


Most Viewed on Education Week



Recent Comments

  • Charles: ELLs in our state ARE required to take State standardized read more
  • Melissa: Maybe I'm just becoming jaded, but this feels to me read more
  • Anonymous: Are you kidding me....UNO is an organizaion that literally destroys read more
  • Meg Baker: Are any schools using ACCESS scores for purposes other than read more
  • Dr. Mendoza: This is great news i must say. Hopefully this DREAM read more