« Duncan, Weingarten Urge Greater Investment in Latino Education | Main | White House, Ed. Dept. Partner to Address Needs of Black English-Language Learners »

Where Key States Stand on the 'DREAM Act' Debate

At least 17 states have laws that make some undocumented immigrant students eligible for in-state tuition rates at public colleges and universities, a new report and commentary from The Migration Policy Institute has found.

The organization found that the states' "DREAM Acts" can differ significantly in their eligibility requirements for in-state tuition, as do state policies regarding the availability of financial aid and other supports. In most cases, the measures seek to lower the barrier to higher education for undocumented students.

The dream in DREAM Act stands for Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors. Speaking at the Congressional Hispanic Caucus Institute's annual policy conference in Washington this week, U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan said "it makes no sense" to deny undocumented immigrant students access to higher education.

"On one side of these policy arguments are those who point to centuries-old legal and ethical principles which hold that children should not be punished for the actions of their parents," said Margie McHugh, director of the institute's National Center of Immigrant Integration Policy.

"On the other are those who see such measures as sanctioning—even rewarding—illegal acts and imposing unwarranted burdens on the public purse."

The Migration Policy Institute report includes a chart that documents policies related to college enrollment, in-state tuition, financial aid, and other supports for the top 15 states of residence for youth eligible for the federal Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program. That  Obama administration initiative grants eligible undocumented youths who were brought to the United States as children temporary relief from deportation and a shot at work authorization.

The chart also details how states are coming down on opposite sides of the in-state tuition debate, or "adopting seemingly small eligibility distinctions that have big impacts, such as disqualifying youth who earned a high school equivalency diploma," a news release from the Migration Policy Institute.

   PSE Policies Chart Top15 DACA States FINAL

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Follow This Blog


Most Viewed on Education Week



Recent Comments

  • Charles: ELLs in our state ARE required to take State standardized read more
  • Melissa: Maybe I'm just becoming jaded, but this feels to me read more
  • Anonymous: Are you kidding me....UNO is an organizaion that literally destroys read more
  • Meg Baker: Are any schools using ACCESS scores for purposes other than read more
  • Dr. Mendoza: This is great news i must say. Hopefully this DREAM read more