« Charters Bills Go Down in Alabama, Mississippi | Main | The Changing Face of Education Advocacy: Read Now »

ALEC Board Wants Common Core Resolution Language 'Tightened Up' Before Vote

I told you on May 11 that the American Legislative Exchange Council delayed its vote on a resolution opposing the Common Core State Standards. That marked the second time that ALEC's board of directors, which has final say on all resolutions and model bills that the conservative, pro-free-market group's various policy "task forces" approve, had an opportunity to deliver a final vote on the common core resolution, but did not.

In a subsequent email, the director of ALEC's Education Task Force, Adam Peshek, informed me that the board sent the resolution back to the task force to clarify some points in the resolution and to get others parts of it "tightened up" before the board considers the final resolution. He stated that the board does not want "federal intrusion" into standards, but at the same time wants to support "strong state standards."

Beyond the fact that the task force now has some work to do, it's difficult to reach any definitive conclusion based on what Peshek wrote. The real test will come when there's that final vote from the board of directors and all the influential players weigh in and lobby for their points of view. Remember, the task force already has adopted a version of the anti-common-core resolution once, last year.

ALEC's vote could influence how state legislators act on common core when they go back to their respective state capitols. But there are a lot of moving parts to the adoption and use of common core, so there isn't necessarily a straight line between a resolution and a seismic shift in the standards initiative's future.

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.


Most Viewed on Education Week



Recent Comments