« Common-Core Delay Approved by N.Y. Assembly, Challenging Gov. Cuomo | Main | Feds Say No, They Actually Haven't Rejected Texas' Testing Waiver Request »

N.J. Union's Position on Testing and Evaluations Disingenuous, Chief Says

Cross-posted from the Teacher Beat blog

by Stephen Sawchuk

In a parting shot to the New Jersey Education Association, the Garden State's outgoing chief, Christopher Cerf, issued a seven-page memo March 5 outlining "misinformation" he clams the union has been spreading about several key initiatives.

In the letter, Cerf says the NJEA has claimed that the state's education department is rushing implementation of the Common Core State Standards, incorporating new and unproven tests into teacher evaluations, and seeking to "amplify" the role of tests. 

In fact, Cerf counters, the NJEA endorsed the law that created the new evaluation system; that the evaluations will begin a full year before assessments aligned to the common core are given to students; and that the law caps the weight given to test scores in the new teacher reviews.

The NJEA seems nonplussed by Cerf's memo, according to Politicoa spokesman told the paper that it preferred to focus on its relationship with the incoming state chief.

Teachers' unions across the nation have been accused of using support for the common core as a point of leverage for slowing down new teacher-evaluation systems, or de-emphasizing test scores as one component of those evaluations, as my colleague Andrew Ujifusa and I have reported.

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.


Most Viewed on Education Week



Recent Comments