« Where's the Beef? | Main | U.K. Teachers Take a Trip Across the Pond »

Is the Tenure Conversation Changing?

The always thoughtful Sherman Dorn thinks I jumped the gun in this post. I disagree.

Although the examples I point to are proposals and may not amount to anything concrete (and they certainly wouldn't be the first), the bigger picture is that the conversation about tenure does seem to be changing. Why? Well, districts and unions in particular are under pressure to rethink how teachers are paid, developed, and managed. Tenure falls under the last category.

Secondly, Dorn goes on to write:

"In collective bargaining agreements, there are provisions for gathering evidence that a teacher has problems in the classroom, putting the teacher in a corrective or probationary status, providing support, and then firing the teacher."

Those provision do indeed exist but, on the other hand most districts don't really have good measures or evaluations in place to give them any real meaning.

I could very well be wrong, but I suspect that in Ohio and D.C. at least, the issue isn't really going to be about "getting rid" of tenure, but about setting clear performance-based standards for granting it.

Bottom line: Although we don't have much data on whether tenure helps or hurts teacher effectiveness, I expect people to start researching it and I expect the debates on it to intensify.

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.


Most Viewed on Education Week



Recent Comments