« Minn. Colleges Must Turn Over Education Syllabi, Court Rules | Main | Michigan Collective Bargaining Proposal Defeated »

Residency Program Tops Tennessee Teacher-Prep Report Card

The Memphis Teacher Residency produces teachers that outperform the average veteran teacher in Tennessee with students in grades 4-8, and in math and science specifically, according to an analysis of teacher-preparation programs released last week by Tennessee's higher education commission.

The MTR and Freed-Hardeman University, in social studies, were the only two preparers to show positive effects on student achievement, and that also had no negative effect scores in any subject. Most programs had a mix of findings. (Teach For America teachers, for instance, did well in grades 4-8, but not in Algebra II.)

Three additional programs—two cohorts of Teach For America and the University of Tennessee, in Knoxville—also produced teachers better than the average novice teacher in the state.

Given the complexity of the findings, you'll want to take a good look at the entire report card.

The findings are especially good news for the Memphis Teacher Residency, which couples an intensive, yearlong apprenticeship for teachers with slimmed-down coursework requirements. The program is now in its third year. Compare and contrast those results with research issued on the similar Boston residency program last year, which found that its residents took a few years to hit their stride.

Tennessee officials used a value-added measure, which traces growth in student achievement to the graduates of particular teacher-preparation programs, to arrive at its conclusions. As part of a regulatory overhaul of parts of provisions in the Higher Education Act, the U.S. Department of Education is expected to issue regulations that would require all states to use similar methods to examine their programs.

Scholars are divided about whether such systems, when applied to value-added, adequately screen out sources of bias that could skew the calculations, as I reported recently on this blog. Tennessee based its result on three years of data, which is generally the baseline that scholars recommend.

So far, those results are only informative in Tennessee. The state hasn't yet incorporated them into a formal program-approval system. (To my knowledge, only Louisiana has done that so far.)

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.


Most Viewed on Education Week



Recent Comments