« Hard Times for Okla. Teachers | Main | Teachers Go 'Idol' »

Debating Test-Based Evaluations

In an op-ed piece in the Atlanta Journal Constitution, a University of Geogia education professor, responding to Steven Brill's New York Times piece, argues that efforts to tie teachers' professional status to student test scores could in effect stifle good instruction. Key passage:

Talented teachers bristle at the idea that they have to conform to the contours of testing mandates in order to be recognized as effective; teaching to the test strips them of the dynamic qualities that have made them effective to begin with. [U.S. Secretary of Education Arne] Duncan might score political points by bashing unions and their emphasis on seniority, but his solution, I believe, will do far more harm than good.

The problem with this line of argument (just to play devil's advocate) is that there are clear examples of schools and teachers that do focus strongly on test-scores and that nevertheless maintain their dynamicism and their connection with students, aren't there? Another way of thinking about this: Shouldn't talented, dynamic teachers (almost by necessity) have more to show for their practice than just a gratifying sense of "student engagement" (important as that is)? That's one of the questions at the heart of this debate.

Just hoping to drum up some conversation ...

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Follow This Blog


Most Viewed On Teacher



Recent Comments