« NBC to Reach Out to Teachers | Main | Teachers Welcomed in 'Education Nation' »

What Do Value-Added Teacher Evaluation Models Miss?

In an impassioned open letter to California's education leaders republished on the Washington Post's Answer Sheet blog, English teacher David Cohen points out eight real-life scenarios that he believes call into question the effectiveness of value-added teacher-evaluation models.

In essence, Cohen argues that real-world factors often muddle the picture that value-added systems proport to furnish. How, he wonders, would a value-added system account for the fact that he has a new principal this year, especially considering research showing that inexperienced leaders tend to lower school performance? And what about the fact that, due to scheduling changes, he now teachers more of his classes in the morning—when sleepy teenagers are not known to be at their sharpest?

"Since half of my classes are now in the morning instead of the afternoon, please suggest a formula for the expected change in my effectiveness as measured on student tests," Cohen asks of his readers.

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Follow This Blog


Most Viewed On Teacher



Recent Comments