NCLB: Act II

The latest news on the reauthorization of the No Child Left Behind Act.

David J. Hoff has been reporting on the biggest issues in K-12 education for more than 10 years for Education Week. He primarily reports now on the reauthorization of the No Child Left Behind Act.

« Washington Movers Chart Big Changes for K-12 Policy | Main | Two 'Pioneer' States Might Be Left out of Pilot Project »

Lawmakers on Left and Right Criticize Pilot Project

The response to the "differentiated accountability" project shows one truth about NCLB: It's hard to please everybody. Looking at reaction from the left and the right on Capitol Hill, you see tepid endorsements for the plan, followed by criticism of the law itself.

From the right, Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, called the pilot project "a good step forward," but added that it doesn't go far enough. In his statement, Cornyn touted his bill, S. 893, that would give states "maximum freedom" to design their own initiatives in five-year performance contracts. The bill has the support of conservative senators—but not the Bush administration.

From the left, Rep. Tim Walz, D-Minn., calls the plan a "long overdue step" in a letter to Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings, who announced the plan last week. But Walz indicates that the announcement won't change his stance on the law: "NCLB is a deeply flawed mandate that is badly in need of significant reform and overhaul," he writes. (Link via Bluestem Prairie.)

These reactions will mean little in the implementation of the latest pilot project. But they show how difficult it will be to gather the votes for NCLB reauthorization—whether it happens this year or next.

P.S. A letter to the editor of The New York Times gave a headline writer the chance to create the latest word play on the NCLB name: No Cynic Left Behind.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.edweek.org/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/3572.

Comments

Of Course NCLB is not going to pass the test for every community or state of the union. As long as education in this country is a personal choice we will never agree on a "national" assessment, and I hope we never will. NCLB has its roots embedded in the Kantian philosophy, whereas the majority of school systems are financially forced to operate under the utilitarian philosophy. Two schools of ethics that are polar opposites and there does not appear to be any middle ground. NCLB is politically correct, but without the monetary support from the federal government to fund its ideal education process, SEAs and LEAs are forced to do what is best for the greatest number of people.

Comment

Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please, no profanity or personal attacks. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.

David Hoff
E-mail me

Get RSS

Get NCLB: Act II delivered by e-mail.
Enter your e-mail here:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Categories

Advertisement
Powered by
Movable Type 3.34

EW Archive