« Clinton vs. Thompson, if Social Studies Teachers Had Their Way | Main | Huckabee on Faith, Creationism, and a School's Curriculum »

Tough Times for ED in '08

| 1 Comment
Money—and the Gates name—apparently can't buy everything. Especially a top spot for education in the presidential campaigns.

My colleagues Erik W. Robelen and Alyson Klein detail the struggles of the ED in '08 campaign in this Edweek story published yesterday. The group, funded with about $15 million so far from the Gates and Broad foundations, is trying to make education a top issue in the presidential campaigns.

To be sure, ED in '08 has a laudable goal. But they seem to have trouble executing and refining their message, which must compete with significant issues on the federal landscape, such as the war in Iraq, the energy crisis, and health care. Even Kanye West, who did an ad for the campaign (see below), can't overcome those obstacles. It's unlikely that giving some money away will work either, which is what ED in '08 is doing in a sweepstakes that seems to have little to do with presidential politics but offers $50,000 in college scholarships—with winners selected at random. ED in '08 chairman and former Colorado Gov. Roy Romer, in a statement in October announcing the sweepstakes, said: "We need to raise the education bar, ask more of our students and encourage them to seek higher education." But a sweepstakes, with winners drawn at random, is a curious way to do that.

Perplexing, too, was Marc Lampkin's comment (he directs Strong American Schools, which runs the campaign) in the EdWeek story that "making [education] a top issue was not the end in itself." That seems to contradict what's on the ED in '08 Web site: "Our goal is to ensure that the nation engages in a rigorous debate and to make education a top priority in the 2008 presidential election."

Because ED in '08 is a nonprofit, federal rules dictate that it can't take a stand on specific legislation, or endorse candidates. But as Alexander Russo points out in a recent blog item, the group can go further to advocate its issues. But that could be the crux of the ED in '08 problem—it may be hard to raise the level of debate about education when you aren't taking a more aggressive stand.

1 Comment

I would like to see some of our public and private leaders adopt much broader thinking on how to get education higher on the public agenda.

This will take some "out of the box" thinking, as in "out of the school" and out of the 9-3pm school day".

If we want more people to support a public policy, we've got to get more people personally involved. If we want our inner city schools to have more funds, and better schools, we've got to get people who don't live in the inner city involved.

I lead a volunteer-based tutoring/mentoring strategy, focusing on programs that work in non-school hours, and non-school locations, and which connect workplace volunteers, other adults than family members, with inner city kids, as one-on-one and group tutors/mentors. Over 30 years of leading such a program, I've seen how many adults have dramatically expanded their understanding, and concern, for inner city issues and kids, and how some have become leaders in this movement.

Thus, I support the growth of these types of programs throughout Chicago and other cities, and encourage busienss to support them as a form of workforce development. As more companies support such strategies, and more workers connect with kids, and stay connected for 2 or more years, we expand support for tutor/mentor programs, and do more to help kids come to school every day better prepared to learn.

If the education establishment, or those advocating different education policies, were to include this thinking in their own community building strategies, I feel that they could expand the number of people beyond poverty, and in business, who might become much more involved in the education issues facing this country.

Comments are now closed for this post.

Follow This Blog


Most Viewed on Education Week



Recent Comments